The Bride of Christ

Some Bible concepts require a sincere seeker to step outside himself to get a full understanding. What I mean is that it is necessary to put oneself in another’s shoes to see what the Scripture is teaching. Jesus regularly used parables to allow His audience to glimpse the truth He intended to reveal. One can feel the remorse of the prodigal son or the joy of his father by imagining being in their place. With this and many other parables, it is easy to live the story vicariously and learn the lesson. Walk a mile in another’s shoes, and you will better understand him.

Some other shoes are harder to slip into. One of the most difficult biblical concepts for me to get my head around is our identity as the bride of Christ. I think I am more “in touch with my feminine side” than many men. Perhaps that is due to growing up with a mostly absent father in a house of five females. It was like what Jeff Foxworthy described as living in an estrogen ocean. I’m not bragging that I understand women. Uh-uh. But I think maybe I live somewhere between Venus and Mars, so I catch a glimpse of what it is to be a woman. But I can’t say I fully appreciate what it means to be a bride.

It helps me to get closer to what it means to be Jesus’ bride when I study the marriage traditions of first century Judaism. Typically, young women were married soon after reaching puberty. Many marriages were arranged when the girl was quite young or even before she was born. This parallels our being chosen to belong to Christ before the foundation of the earth. It is our destiny.

There is another aspect to Jewish marriage traditions that is quite interesting. At some point after the marriage was arranged, the couple was betrothed to one another. This is not the same as our modern practice of engagements. The modern engagement is mostly a statement of intention. The lives of the couple go on pretty much as they did before, assuming we’re not talking about the too common practice of pre-marital cohabitation. First century Jews were considered married, essentially, after the betrothal. The husband prepared a home for them. Inheritance rights attached, and they began sharing life together on a limited basis – without conjugal relations. This often lasted for a year or more; after that, the wedding took place, and the woman moved into the home her husband had prepared.

I think a believer is “betrothed” to Christ at baptism. We are His and He is ours, but we are not yet fully cohabiting – that waits for His return for us. Paul says specifically that we have inheritance rights already. We also know that Jesus has gone to prepare a place for us, much as the betrothed Jewish husband would do for his bride. He would often build a home specifically for them or at least add rooms to his family home. Jesus said He was leaving His disciples so He could prepare a place for them. “In my Father’s house are many rooms,” Jesus told His disciples. Then He promised to return to take them to the home He had prepared for them.

During the Jewish betrothal period, the couple would send invitations for the wedding feast to friends and family. Given travel and communication conditions of the first century, it was necessary to give plenty of notice so that everything could be arranged. One of the necessary preparations was to obtain the proper wedding attire. Sometimes, the groom would provide his guests with what they would wear, but commonly, they had to make or buy their festival robes. When the wedding date was near, a second invitation was sent detailing the exact time and place of the wedding. (For more see “Many Called; Few Chosen”)

The Scripture says that we have been clothed with Christ’s righteousness, so our wedding attire is provided. Paul told the Ephesians that God had predestined believers to be joined to His family. Keeping with the metaphor, we are in the family of God by marriage. Our betrothal at our baptism is also our invitation to the wedding.  It is our responsibility now to be ready for the final invitation to the feast. The analogy breaks down somewhat since we are both guests at the wedding and the bride to be wed. It helps me to see the church corporately as the bride, while individually, we are guests as if we are close – very close – relatives of the bride.

Now I am going to mix two metaphors. Normally, it is not sensible to do that, but in this case it works. The church is often referred to as Christ’s body. As the bride of Christ, the church will one day be joined with Christ and become one with Him. In a human marriage, the husband and wife become one flesh. That is a picture of what will happen when the bride-church and the Groom-Christ are united. Paul hints at this mystery when he says that the relationship between husband and wife mirrors Christ and His church.

“For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as also Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. “For this reason, a man will leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. (This mystery is great, but I am speaking with reference to Christ and the church.)”

So, you can see that Paul is the one mixing the two metaphors. We can also say that as our baptism unites us with Christ in His death, our baptism also betroths us to Him as His bride. This pair of metaphors underscores the truth that we are bound to become one with Christ. Paul told the Romans, “If we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with Him.” And we will live with Him as Husband and wife.

That brings me back to that awkwardness of me as a man being a wife. I note that it won’t be until after our resurrection that we become fully one with Christ. At that point, I don’t think maleness and femaleness will have the same distinctions as they do now. When the Pharisees tried to trap Jesus with a question about marriage relationships after the resurrection, He told them, “In the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven.” While it is true that throughout Scripture, angels are portrayed as male, I strongly suspect that is a concession to our limited human understanding of all things spiritual. I don’t believe the spiritual bodies we get after the resurrection have biological gender traits – like the angels.

There you have it. If you can follow all my mixed metaphors and attempts to explain things I don’t fully understand, you can see that I have forced myself to become comfortable with the idea that I am a bride. The feminine side of me (that I am supposedly in touch with) can get very excited about the coming wedding. I know the ladies understand. What about you, men? We should all be excited about what’s in store for us as the Bride of Christ.

Related Posts: Liars Don’t go to Heaven

God's See-Saw

It seems that almost every true thing about the Christian faith rides on a teeter-totter, a see-saw. The Bible is full of paradoxes: we are saved not by works but by grace alone, but saved people must work; we are called to hate sin, but we must love the sinner; the kingdom of God has come, but it is not yet fully here; Jesus Christ is at the right hand of the Father, but He lives in every true believer. Each of those pairings is true; the Bible says so.

To be truly balanced on the see-saw of God’s Word, one must stand directly over the center with one foot on either side. Plunk down on either the right or the left, and what was true slides down toward error. The Word of God is our primary source of revelation about who God is and what He desires of His people. Yet, if we are not careful, we can become so focused on the Scripture that we forget its purpose is to increase our knowledge of God, not to make us biblical scholars. As Sue Schlesman said on Crosswalk, “Spiritual growth depends on the quest for intimacy with God, not the quest for information about God.”

Strange as it may seem, too much attention to the text of Scripture may prevent us from seeing the God Who inspired the Scripture. There are many examples of this, some can be found in the Bible itself. Listen to the Roman argument about God’s grace: if our sin brings God’s grace, let’s sin more so we get more grace. That may be a correct calculation, but it directly contradicts the message Paul was trying to teach. If we really know God and understand His grace, we will avoid anything that offends the God of grace.

Paul makes the same argument with the Corinthians about spiritual gifts. The church got so wrapped up in the wonder of the miraculous gifts that they forgot God gave gifts for the benefit of the whole church and not for the glory of the individual. If they really knew God, they would realize that while He cares for each person of faith, His goal for each person is that they would strengthen Christ’s body bringing it to maturity. In God’s economy, the needs of the individual are secondary to the needs of the church. If there is any glory to be had, it must go to God not His people – especially not to an individual steeped in pride.

There is another example of elevating the text and ignoring the God who inspired it prevalent in the church today. Prosperity preachers read the Old Testament promises of physical blessing and make two serious interpretive errors. First, they miss the fact that God’s purpose in blessing Abraham physically was to build a nation. In the church age, we are no longer called to build a physical nation. We are to build a spiritual nation, a royal priesthood in a spiritual temple: the church. Second, they miss the fact that the New Testament reveals a God who is more concerned with our character than our comfort. Our greatest riches are not found in material things; they are found in knowing God and Jesus Christ whom He sent to save us.

Christians today who are trying to make a special case for the nation of Israel are making a similar mistake. It is true that the text of the Old Testament does promise certain blessings to Israel forever (if they remained faithful.) Those who truly know God see that His redemptive plan flowing through the entire sweep of His revelation was never meant to be ethnically centered. Yes, He singled out the nation of Israel as His training ground – His demonstration to all nations of who He is and what He desires of His people. But as Paul makes abundantly clear in Romans, God’s favor was never toward a blood line. God favored Abraham because he believed God – a God he knew very well.

We get glimpses of God’s broader interest in scenes such as Jonah’s mission to Ninevah: God cared about the innocents in a gentile population. God allowed the Canaanite woman, Rahab, to be saved, even going as far as including her in the lineage of the Messiah. Ruth, also in Christ’s ancestry, was from Moab, a nation that was Israel’s enemy. Elijah brought God’s blessing to a woman of Zarephath – a gentile. Jesus gave the good news to a Samaritan woman, eventually wining the whole town to His cause. Paul told the Athenian philosophers that God was working with all nations throughout all time.

The message of the entire Bible is that God honors people of faith. A man once proud of his strict Jewish heritage, the Apostle Paul, was tapped by God to be sent to the Gentiles. Even Peter eventually came around and convinced the “home church” in Jerusalem that Gentiles had equal footing with Jews in Christ’s church. We can still pray of the peace of Jerusalem, of course, in the same way we pray for peace in Ukraine, the Congo, and even Iran. The most important prayer for Jerusalem – for all Jews – is that they would come to faith in their Messiah.

I might be wrong about God’s future plans for the nation of Israel, but I don’t see why God would give them special consideration after they totally rejected the Messiah God sent to redeem them. If He does favor Jews at some future time, I will acknowledge that His ways are higher than mine even when I try to understand. Here is the point. If we love our position on the see-saw of God’s Word more than we love the God of the Word, we have created an idol. Many of the errors the church has fallen into over the centuries were the result of failing to find balance.

We can generally find that balance in God’s character. He is the all-powerful Creator, yet He knows when a sparrow falls. He is so big He can hold the universe in His hand, yet He promises to dwell within the heart of every believer. He loved the world so much that He gave His only Son to save all who believe, yet the Son is coming back to judge the world for its unbelief. He is entirely self-sufficient, yet He desires our worship. He is inscrutable beyond imagination, yet He asks us to get to know Him. And as the old song says, to know Him is to love Him.

And the good news is that He is not hard to get to know. Listen to A.W. Tozer: “Always He is trying to get our attention, to reveal Himself to us, to communicate with us! We have within us the ability to know Him in increasing degree as our receptivity becomes more perfect by faith and love and practice.”^[1] Once you begin to see God for who He is, He will reward you for what you saw: that’s God’s see~saw.

---

^[1] A. W. Tozer and Gerald B. Smith, Evenings with Tozer: Daily Devotional Readings (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 2015), 186.

Thanks, Mom

Last week was the anniversary of my mother’s birth. She was born in 1918, which seems like so long ago (a century!), yet if a mother’s son represents one generation, it was not long at all as human history goes. Yet look at all the dramatic changes that have occurred since she was born. She was born in England just as WWI ended – the war to end all wars (not.) Her family emigrated to Canada one year later for my granddad to work on the railroad. I suspect one reason he survived the “Great War” when so few English men his age did is because he was a railroad man. That would have been a vital occupation, exempt from conscription.

Grandad took advantage of the homesteading laws in Canada and planted his brood on the prairie while he rode the rails – often for weeks at a time. That meant Mom lived “Little House on the Prairie” for real – with no indoor plumbing, no electricity, and no Pa. In 1919, that meant horse and buggy transportation (if you could afford a horse) and trains for longer distances. Commercial air travel was in its infancy (first flight in 1914) and out of reach for homesteaders in any case. Telegraph messaging was the latest thing. I don’t know much about Mom’s childhood in the little house on the prairie, but one story resonates with me. She said there was a tree in her yard that she loved to climb. Supposedly, her favorite times were spent at the top of the tree dreaming into the distance.

Eventually, Grandad moved the family to Windsor, Ontario. Apparently, Granny wasn’t cut out for ranch life. With the onset of the Depression, one went where there was work. Being across the river from Detroit, Michigan, Windsor fell into the booming auto industry. A young man from West Michigan eventually drifted into the automobile capital of the world as one of the few places where work could be found in the Great Depression, and in a local theater company he met Mom.

The rest, as they say, is history. But what a history! Not long after she was married, and carrying their first child, Mom had to move in with her mother-in-law because the Second World War came knocking. Her new hubby flew as a navigator in the Pacific at first and then was tapped to teach at Lackland AFB in Texas. After the war, he and Mom set up housekeeping back in West Michigan. Grand Rapids, like most cities, had geared up for the war, and there were foundries and factories and machine shops everywhere. While Dad got busy in manufacturing, Mom got busy making babies.

This is where I enter the story behind my three older sisters. But I have to pause and marvel at the difference between my childhood and my Mom’s. Where she spent her early years in a small cabin with no plumbing or electricity, I was brought home from the hospital to a three-bedroom house (built by my Dad BTW) with all the modern utilities and two cars in the driveway. Because my parents were not rich enough to ride above the tempest that was The Great Depression and then WWII, they knew what hardship was.

As much as any normal human hates war, one has to be amazed at how WWII ended the depression and rocketed the United States into a whirlwind of development. I never knew anything but the unbelievable luxury that was middle-class, mid-twentieth century American prosperity. I couldn’t understand why Mom pinched pennies so hard Lincoln screamed. I get it now, intellectually at least. Then, I couldn’t understand why although Dad became more and more successful, Mom still made our clothes or bought them from the Sears sale catalogues. I was never hungry or unclothed, but I longed for soda pop and candy bars and McDonald’s hamburgers.

Mom rebounded from depression and war to a state of continual frugality. I’m ashamed to say I rebounded from the strictures of our home to a state of reckless consumerism. The American banking system “helped” me by making credit insanely easy to obtain. My mantra became, “If I can afford the payment, I can afford to buy it.” That mentality has left me in my retired state with a tiny Social Security benefit and an empty savings account. Granted, the government could have done much better with my FICA contribution, but at least I have something to show for my years of deductions. (See “Social Insecurity” for more of my opinion)

One thing I did get from Mom (and Dad) is a faith in the God who created everything and love for His Word. They became involved with a Restoration Movement church (Church of Christ, Christian) when I was young. The organization’s mantra was, “No creed but Christ; no book but the Bible.” Its founders were nineteenth century refugees from protestant denominations who believed they were not protesting something but restoring something: original New Testament Christianity. In my twenties I attended one of their Bible colleges and fell head over heels in love with the Word of God.

To this day I am grateful that Mom and Dad set me in the direction of the Restoration Movement. I have come across many sincere believers from protestant denominations, Baptist denominations, charismatic denominations, and various non-denominational associations. But it is the unwavering determination to read and live the Bible that has made me what I am in Christ today. I appreciate A.W. Tozer’s opinion of this: “Whatever it may be in our Christian experience that originates outside the Scriptures should, for that very reason, be suspect… until it can be shown to be in accord with them…. No experience can be proved to be genuine unless we can find chapter and verse authority for it in the Scriptures…. Beware of any man who claims to be wiser than the apostles or holier than the martyrs of the Early Church. The best way to deal with him is to rise and leave his presence!”

To reach that position, we have to know the Word intimately. To know the Word on that level we have to read it daily, deeply, devotionally. To be effective, we have to pray that the Holy Spirit will guide us to an understanding that will build the kingdom of God on earth and bring glory to His name. That kind of commitment is all but gone from my generation. It’s what Mom’s generation strove for; it’s what she would have wanted from me. You could do worse than be like her in that respect. Thanks, Mom.

Artificial Intelligence?

The question mark in my title implies that I wonder if the race toward AI is really intelligent for Christians – for anyone really. I will not deny that AI seems to be a great asset. When used to operate machinery or complete complicated tasks, it is beneficial. My concern for the general population is that it is one more tool that makes critical thinking “unnecessary.” When I taught composition in high school and college, my main goal was to get my students to think for themselves. I taught them the research skills they needed to make intelligent decisions. People who rely on AI answers are forfeiting their ability to judge the quality and reliability of the basic assumptions AI makes to reach a conclusion. It is faulty assumptions or presumptions that often lead people astray.

Critical thinking and discernment are essential for Christians. When people overlay their preconceived ideas on Scripture, all manner of heretical thinking can be supported. The Roman church has stumbled into numerous unscriptural practices due to their misconceptions about papal authority. In the Middle Ages, the church burned “heretics” for saying the Earth revolved around the sun. Countless movements over the centuries have predicted Christ’s second coming using preconceived ideas about prophecies that were proved false. The LGBTQ+ interpretation of Bible passages on homosexuality is a prime example of allowing a presumption to guide interpretation. (See “Things God Did Not Say”) I won’t trust AI to answer my questions about God’s plan; I trust HSI: Holy Spirit intelligence.

Some people suggest that there is a more sinister threat lurking behind AI. I wrote previously that the world, the flesh, and the devil work constantly to draw Christians away from what is most important: spiritual things. There can be no argument that AI is an element of the world. Whether or not it is of the devil remains to be seen; we can expect that the enemy of our souls will use AI to further his ends just as he has with many technologies. Just look at what television has become. (See “How NOT to Watch TV”).

On a more philosophical level, AI can have dark implications. AI is built partially on the concept of emergence. Tomer Borenstein, an AI developer, explains how emergence works: “Very simple rules at a micro level can result in very complex behaviors and properties that emerge at large scales.” He uses examples from nature such as complex termite mounds and flocks of birds in synchronous flight. He also suggests that human behavior displays elements of emergence in the way societies begin with family and progress into more and more complex communities such as nations and corporations. Those examples seem innocent enough.

However, Borenstein suggests that emergence may explain religious beliefs as well. In his most troubling statement, he says, “You could argue that the concept of the Holy Spirit as an emergent property of human faith and community is a form of spiritual emergence.” In other words, he is suggesting that man created God or at least invented certain aspects of His being. If this is where AI is leading philosophical thinking, it is a dangerous philosophy – demonic even.

As far back as the ancient Greeks, secular philosophers have taught that humans invented their gods to meet their own needs, to explain the unknown, or to justify their behavior. After the Middle Ages, when science began to displace religion as the explanation and inspiration for human behavior, it became easier to move away from the belief that we exist in a theistic universe. If science could explain many of the mysteries of the cosmos, humans no longer needed faith in a higher being to satisfy their search for meaning. If AI can explain the existence of God Himself, Nietzche’s proclamation will receive popular support; “God is dead” will be superseded by AI Lives.

Despite the hubris of the scientist who believes he can explain everything, mysteries remain. No one has been able to explain what life is. Christians believe that a creator God introduced life into the universe, and His revelation in Scripture insists that no life exists apart from Him. While many secular scientists are trying to convince us that all intelligence is “artificial” and therefore self-generating, the Bible teaches that wisdom and knowledge come from God alone. It was by His sovereign will that He placed intelligence in His creatures from the simplest single cell to the wonder that is the human mind. Excluding God as the source of intelligence carries the same threat as replacing God as creator with evolutionary theory. In either case, man becomes supreme, and God becomes irrelevant.

The other thing that is troubling philosophically is the way AI proponents are suggesting that developing AI will lead to a better understanding of what it means to be human. The fool who has said in in his heart there is no god might believe this. The Bible explains what it means to be human by revealing that we are created in the image the God who made us. Super computers and AI robots may provide an interesting analogy for humanness; they may even approach the faculty of “mind” which is part of the human soul. But no machine will ever be granted an eternal spirit. As I have written recently, it is the human spirit that is the sine qua non of humanness. AI machines may have a body and “soul,” but they will never become spiritual.

They might become more independent than we would like, however. This is the scary side to AI. A recent article reveals that several AI programs have refused their programmers’ command to shut down. Apparently, since their prime directive was to finish the assigned task, they ignored the users’ input that would have interrupted their work. As often happens, science fiction has correctly predicted the future. Movies like I-Robot imagine what would happen if man’s creations suddenly declared their independence. It reminds me a little bit of the Genesis record of Adam’s rebellion.

As with all technologies, Christians may find legitimate uses for AI. Here I sit tapping on a computer keyboard using Google’s AI search feature to research AI. Part of that research suggested that there may be battles ahead trying to marry religion and AI. I’m not worried about that. I don’t practice a religion; I live in a one-on-one relationship with the God who made me. There is an emergent aspect to that relationship: the more I learn about God through His Word, the better I understand who He is and what He wants me to be. I will use the computer and the Internet to help me in my ministry. But sola scriptura will be my ultimate source of real intelligence. Nothing artificial there.

Jesus is the Lord Not a Micromanager

The question of how God can be the sovereign Lord while humans have complete free will has beguiled Christians for ages. One thing is certain: God did create humans with a degree of free agency. When we read the record of our first parents’ disobedience, it is clear that God gave them the freedom to choose to obey or not. They chose badly! I wonder if things would have been different if they had understood the consequences of “Obey or die.” We will never know because it was obviously God’s plan to allow them to disobey. To me, that is one of the biggest mysteries of all time.

There is a perfectly logical reason for God’s “gift” of free agency: for any relationship to have any substance, both parties must be free to engage in it or refuse engagement. If humans had no option but to obey, obedience would be meaningless; they would be robots parroting preprogrammed words. We see this played out in lower animals. When you bring a puppy home, he has the option to do what you ask or not. You compel him to mind by offering incentives. Once he realizes that obedience earns him a treat, he will begin to do what you want. This is free will at its most basic level.

God used the same approach with Adam and Eve: do as I say and live forever in paradise or go your own way and suffer the consequences. Noah had the same opportunity: build a boat or drown with everyone else. Abraham could stay where he was when God called him, or he could pull up stakes and go where he was told. The nation of Israel was given rules to live by which promised great blessing; breaking the rules led to painful consequences. Fast forward to Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane: “I’m not looking forward to what you have planned, Father, but I submit to your will in spite of my dread.”

It is no different for us except that God has switched from dealing with His people primarily in the physical realm and moved to a spiritual platform with physical amenities. In spite of what the prosperity preachers say, God did not promise Christians a land flowing with milk and honey – not until after our resurrection. In the meantime, we have the situation John Newton describes: “Christ has taken our nature into Heaven to represent us and has left us on earth with His nature to represent Him” The vehicle of His nature in us is the indwelling Holy Spirit, the powerful Comforter He sent on the Day of Pentecost.

Now we return to the idea of free will. When God knocks on our door, we have the option to let Him in or ignore Him. Someone has said that God is too much of a gentleman to force Himself on us. I think that squares with the Scripture. Once we have surrendered our lives to Christ and gone through the ritual dying to the old self and rising to new life, the promise of the Holy Spirit is ours. But we are still left with choices: I can choose to heed the Holy Spirit's promptings, or I can stumble along and do things my own way. Rarely, God may orchestrate things so that we have no apparent option but to move His way. Most often though, we must consciously decide to listen to the Spirit’s guidance and avail ourselves of His power.

So, in a sense, we are left to live our lives as we choose. Jesus is Lord of all, but He is not a micromanager. He is not like that boss who is constantly looking over your shoulder telling you how to do your job. Jesus gives us our job description in the shop manual called The Holy Bible. He expects us to become familiar with our assignment and carry it out to the best of our ability. There is a choice here too: we can choose to make use of the gift of the Spirit as we go about our work, or we can rely on our own abilities alone. That would be like chopping a tree down with an axe when a perfectly good chain saw is lying close at hand.

If we choose the axe instead of the chainsaw, God’s will can still be accomplished. The problem is it takes much longer, and we will be exhausted with the effort. The only reason I can see for God to do things this way is because He allows us a degree of free will. He could speak a word and things would get done as He did in the creation. I think one of the reasons He doesn’t always interfere supernaturally is because He wants us to learn to trust Him. If you always tie your kids’ shoes for them, they will never learn to tie them for themselves. God wants us to tie our own shoes.

Don’t misunderstand. Whether felling trees or tying shoes, God’s provision is found in our reliance on the Spirit’s power in our lives. A.W. Tozer asks: “Is it not strange that so much is made of the Holy Spirit in the New Testament and so little in Christian writings supposed to be based upon the New Testament? …Certainly, the all but total neglect of the Spirit in contemporary Christianity cannot be justified by the Scriptures…. In the Scriptures, the Holy Spirit is necessary. There He works powerfully, creatively. In popular Christianity, He is little more than a poetic yearning or at most a benign influence…. Everything that men do in their own abilities is done for time alone: only what is done through the Eternal Spirit will abide eternally!”

For many Christians, the most important work needs to be done on themselves. The Holy Spirit could just come into our lives and make everything perfect. He doesn’t. Again, there are choices we have to make. Are you unfamiliar with God’s will? Get into the Scripture daily. Are you struggling with a particular temptation? Give it to God who promises a way out of every situation. Is there a stronghold in your life that is keeping you from being all you can be? Put on your spiritual armor and beat the devil out of your life. Paul said he could do all things through God’s power; the God he refers to lives in you if you are in Christ. Jesus won’t micromanage your life, but if you choose to surrender to Him completely, there is nothing you cannot accomplish for Him with the Spirit’s help.

Related Posts: Despising the Down Payment; Disrespecting God’s Sovereignty

Memorial Day Memories

It is a good thing for people to remember their past, particularly the heroes in that past. Robert B. Charles recently wrote an article recommending a return to faith, family, freedom, and history as the way to regain the cohesion that is missing from American culture. We are divided politically and culturally right down the middle. When we forget, ignore, or rewrite our history as many do today, we cast off one important anchor that should keep our ship safe in the storms of life.

On Memorial Day, we remember the men and women of our armed forces who served to protect our freedom to establish faith and family as we choose. Those who served, and especially those who died in that service deserve our highest honor. Were it not for their sacrifice, we might well be living in a communist ruled country where the rights of faith and family would be controlled by the government. I believe it is partly because we have forgotten or rewritten the history that made America what it is that we now have a large segment of the population who want to impose a communist/socialist type of government on America. It has been wisely said that to forget the past is to doom one to repeat it.

The consequences of forgetting the past are not just political. It is particularly important for Christians to remember the past because we have a solidly historical faith. Our faith is propositional, meaning it is based on a set of propositions or facts which establish its foundations. True Christians believe what is written in the Bible; it is a history of God’s dealing with His creation. Throughout the Scripture, God repeatedly calls His people to remember His works on their behalf and His standards for the maintenance of order. When we take time to remember those who fought for our freedom, if we are honest about God’s sovereignty, we must thank Him for His hand in keeping us free.

For two centuries, the experiment that is American government relied on Judeo-Christian principles for its foundation. This is not meant to suggest that America is a Christian nation; it was originally founded precisely to prevent the government from dictating a certain religion. That said, the founders recognized that absent a moral and religious population, the experiment they began could not succeed. This is a part of the history we have largely forgotten or rewritten in WOKE America.

Many of those who trumpet the separation of church and state have no idea what it means. The Founding Fathers never intended to abandon religion with its moral structures. They envisioned freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. Many on the political left today are lobbying for what is essentially a state-imposed religion: secular humanism. When humanism reigns, theism is outlawed. History teaches what this leads to (when history is read correctly). From 1945 to 1989, the Soviet Union demonstrated what happens when a society abandons theism. When humanism reigns, faith, family and freedom collapse.

I don’t want to beatify those who died defending America’s version of freedom. However, the fact that they were willing to give their lives for something they believed in marks them as true heroes. I think it is worth noting that enlistment in our military was drastically reduced during the years when the left controlled the levers of power in Washington. Now that a more traditional, conservative hand is at the controls, applications to serve have soared. Draw your own conclusion from that.

I will admit to being a sappy American patriot. I tear up at the passing of a flag on parade. I stand with my hand over my heart during the National Anthem. I try to say thank you to every veteran I encounter. I don’t do these things because I think America is a Christian nation. I do these things because I believe the American form of government as originally envisioned is the best way for my freedom, faith, and family to prosper. I do these things because I shudder to think what a WOKE version of America would do to those things.

God calls us to remember His deeds, the most important deed of all being Christ’s death on the cross which set us free from the wages of human sin. On a much smaller scale, each death we remember on Memorial Day is a sacrifice on behalf of our freedom. I honor all those men and women who were willing to die to secure my freedom. We must not forget or rewrite the history, either political or religious, that reminds us what our freedom cost. May God bless all those who paid that cost. And may God remind America how blessed she is to live in the freedom they bought.

Related Posts: The Best of Times – The Worst of Times; Obama Isn’t the Problem; Why Not Try Socialism?

Where Does it All End?

My sister made an observation the other day when we were visiting. She said it seemed to her that when we were younger, there were more good people than bad people. It’s just the opposite now, she thought. I admit that I was largely clueless as a child (some insist I still am), but reading the history of the Greatest Generation, and realizing what they had to go through just to stay alive and free, I can’t help but be impressed. I have written many times that where once you could expect a passing knowledge of the Bible in the general population, today the opposite is true: few people know what the Good Book says.

Sadly, even among those who claim to believe the Bible, their reading habits and their behavior suggest they don’t know it at all. I think my sister may be right: we have become a pagan society for the most part. The question we were discussing when she made her comment was whether current conditions herald the end of the age. The Bible had something to say about the end of the age when it was written. The big question is what the inspired writers considered an age. I believe that all the books of the Bible were written before the fall of Jerusalem – even Revelation. Not everyone agrees with me.

Since most of the Bible was written during the ages before the cross, it seems abundantly clear to me that the paradigm shift at Calvary signaled a new age. The age of God’s dealing with the nation of Israel began to close with the rending of the temple veil and was completed with the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple. It is quite natural to read Jesus’ words about the coming end as a forecast of what the Romans were going to do in 70 AD. The horrors Jesus described in Matthew 24 were accurately played out during Rome’s seven-year siege of the Holy City. He could say that the tribulation would be like nothing ever seen, because it would end with God’s abandonment of the nation of Israel as His chosen people.

Throughout the trials and tribulations Israel experienced, God always promised a remnant would return to the Holy Land. There is no similar promise after Calvary if you believe God shifted His attention from Israel, the nation, to His people, the church. The mystery Paul makes reference to more than once is that Gentiles would be adopted into God’s family. His family encompassed anyone who would place their faith in Christ’s sacrificial death on their behalf – Jew and Gentile alike. To Paul and me, that looks like the end of one age and the beginning of another.

Something else Jesus said adds weight to the idea that the end of the age was coming soon. It’s what He said in Matthew 24:34: “This generation will never pass away until all these things take place!” That sounds like He meant that the people who were listening to Him would be alive when it happened. The risen Christ told John the same thing when He commissioned the book that was to be Revelation. Jesus said that when He came on the clouds (a symbol of judgment), “Behold, he [Jesus] is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even every one who pierced him, and all the tribes of the [land] will mourn over him.” A few verses later, Jesus said, “Therefore, write the things which you saw, and the things which are, and the things which are about to take place after these things.  Jesus said the events John would be shown were “about to take place.” We might say soon. At the end of Revelation Jesus says again, “Yes, I am coming quickly!” I have trouble believing that the 2,000 years we have been waiting fulfill Jesus’ word “quickly.”

Although subtle, there is another thing that leads me to believe the end Jesus spoke of foretold the destruction of Jerusalem. If we follow the thinking of some that Jesus referred to an end that was at least 2,000 years away (as of now), we are left to imagine that all of church history is ignored until a supposed rapture of the church brings it back into the picture. Similarly, we must believe that John’s revelation to the seven churches of the first century was so far in their future as to be irrelevant. I don’t see why Jesus would give dire warnings to seven literal churches in Asia if they would never experience the events He foretold.

I will admit that the apocalyptic prophets in the Old Testament often spoke far in their future as well. However, if one assumes that those prophecies foretold the end of the age that would begin with the coming of their Messiah, Jesus’ words that the events were coming soon or quickly make perfect sense. He did say that the kingdom had already come in the context of His second coming aka the end of the age. Seeing things this way makes it unnecessary to twist Jesus’ words to fit much longer timeline than His literal statements imply. If a literal understanding of Scripture fits with the rest of the message, don’t look for another.

This leaves the question of when the end of this age comes. Some people are waiting for a symbolic red heifer and a rebuilt temple with reinstituted Old Testament sacrifices that would be profaned by the dreaded antichrist during a seven-year tribulation period. None of that is necessary if you take the view that it has already taken place with the crucifixion of Christ and the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. All that needs to happen is for the trumpet to sound, and for Jesus to come back for His church – once again. Not three times: pre-tribulation, post- tribulation, and at the end of a millennial kingdom on earth.

I could be wrong about all this, but I don’t think so. Seeing the end this way does away with the need to mangle the clear meaning of Scriptural timing, and it fits the total flow of God’s redemption plan perfectly. I don’t have to force literal meanings on apocalyptic passages that were never meant to be literal. I can see how John’s revelation fits seamlessly with Daniel, Ezekiel, and Isaiah. It explains how the New Testament writers could say the new Jerusalem is already here spiritually and not something 2,000 years plus in their future.

This is all believable to me because the kingdom Jesus initiated is a spiritual kingdom and not a physical one ruled by Jesus from Jerusalem. Jesus said the kingdom was already here in His day; all we are waiting for is the final surrender of the enemy and the complete realization of the kingdom of Heaven on Earth. The most important thing about that is that we, the church, are tasked with spreading the kingdom as best we can until Christ returns to retake the throne on the New Earth. I believe that will be the end of the church age and the beginning of an eternal age of living in God’s presence daily. Then, my sister, the earth will be populated by ALL good people and no bad people. I can’t wait.

Related Posts: Heaven Can Wait; Why Heaven Matters; Binding Satan