One thing was surprisingly absent from the news during the
past holiday season: the war on Christmas. The previous few years seem to have
been dominated by stories about merchants or manufacturers or municipalities who
banned Christmas imagery and even the phrase, “Merry Christmas” from their
premises. Perhaps I was sleeping, but I missed that this year. I love a good
argument about freedom of speech and religious expression during the celebration
of the birth of the Savior. It makes a great platform to announce the reason
for the season. (Note tongue in cheek.)
But while our “culture war,” as Bill O'Reilly likes to call
it, may be in remission, the tragic events in Paris today bring to mind how
important it is to understand that some religious fanatics really do practice
war on those who don’t follow the tenets of their religion. The murders
at Charlie Hedbo remind the
sensitive world-watcher that killing in the name of one’s god is not some
Medieval aberration, but rather a present reality.
Although there were those who attempted to downplay the
religious motivations of the 9/11 attackers, that day woke clear thinkers to
the fact that war has been declared and it is religious in nature. The real
truth is that 9/11 was far from the first salvo fired by the radical proponents
of Islam against their “Great Satan,” the United States. The World Trade Center
had previously been attacked, mostly unsuccessfully, back in 1993. The African
embassy bombings (1998) and the USS Cole (October 2000) were also evident
tokens of the war few people recognized.
On one hand, I am in awe of the total commitment displayed
by the Islamic radicals. I can almost respect it. Although their tactics are
deplorable to civilized society, their commitment is laudable. If only more
Christians were so totally committed to their faith. I am not suggesting that
armed Christians spray the Grand Haven city council with bullets in protest of
the decision to disguise
the cross on Dewey Hill. When Jesus said that after He left, His disciples
might want to strap
on a sword, I don’t think that is what He meant. (The complete discussion
of His intent is the subject of another post.)
What is clear is that too many believers sit motionless when
radicals with different beliefs assault their traditions and institutions. I
don’t doubt that if half the citizens of Grand Haven who find no offense in a
cross on Dewey Hill had stood up, the cross would still stand. Apathy is the
enemy’s most effective tool. As Edmund
Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good
men to do nothing.” So we don’t need Kalashnikovs to fight since “the
weapons of our warfare are not carnal,” but we do need weapons. Apathy and
inaction do not qualify.
I pray it will not take incidents happening here like the
attack in Paris this morning to wake up believers in this country to the fact
that a war has been declared. We need to be aware that our beliefs are being
just as maliciously attacked by more subtle warriors in the name of tolerance and
political correctness. I don’t mean to equate the ACLU or the GLBT movements with
ISIL, but shame on us if we wait until we are facing assault weapons to stand
for our rights. Truthfully, I wonder if many believers will stand against real
persecution if they won’t stand against the more subtle kind we face now.
I love the story of a church in a persecuted land which was
invaded by a group of armed men. The men aimed their weapons at the
congregation and told those who would not die for their beliefs to leave. After
some skulked out, the men lowered their weapons and said they wished the
worship to continue now that only true believers remained. I never want to be
in that situation, but I hope I would be among those who remain if ever I am.
No comments:
Post a Comment