My sister made an observation the other day when we were visiting. She said it seemed to her that when we were younger, there were more good people than bad people. It’s just the opposite now, she thought. I admit that I was largely clueless as a child (some insist I still am), but reading the history of the Greatest Generation, and realizing what they had to go through just to stay alive and free, I can’t help but be impressed. I have written many times that where once you could expect a passing knowledge of the Bible in the general population, today the opposite is true: few people know what the Good Book says.
Sadly, even among those who claim to believe the Bible,
their reading habits and their behavior suggest they don’t know it at all. I
think my sister may be right: we have become a pagan society for the most part.
The question we were discussing when she made her comment was whether current
conditions herald the end of the age. The Bible had something to say about the
end of the age when it was written. The big question is what the inspired
writers considered an age. I believe that all the books of the Bible were
written before the fall of Jerusalem – even Revelation. Not everyone agrees
with me.
Since most of the Bible was written during the ages before
the cross, it seems abundantly clear to me that the paradigm shift at Calvary
signaled a new age. The age of God’s dealing with the nation of Israel began to
close with the rending of the temple veil and was completed with the
destruction of Jerusalem and its temple. It is quite natural to read Jesus’
words about the coming end as a forecast of what the Romans were going to
do in 70 AD. The horrors Jesus described in Matthew
24 were accurately played out during Rome’s seven-year siege of the Holy
City. He could say that the tribulation would be like nothing ever seen,
because it would end with God’s abandonment of the nation of Israel as His
chosen people.
Throughout the trials and tribulations Israel experienced,
God always promised a remnant would return to the Holy Land. There is no
similar promise after Calvary if you believe God shifted His attention from
Israel, the nation, to His people, the church. The
mystery Paul makes reference to more than once is that Gentiles would be adopted
into God’s family. His family encompassed anyone who would place their faith in
Christ’s sacrificial death on their behalf – Jew and Gentile alike. To Paul and
me, that looks like the end of one age and the beginning of another.
Something else Jesus said adds weight to the idea that the
end of the age was coming soon. It’s what He said in Matthew
24:34: “This generation will never pass away until all these things take place!” That sounds like
He meant that the people who were listening to Him would be alive when it
happened. The risen Christ told John the same thing when He commissioned the
book that was to be Revelation. Jesus
said that when He came on the clouds (a symbol of judgment), “Behold, he
[Jesus] is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even every one
who pierced him, and all the tribes of the [land] will mourn over him.” A few
verses later, Jesus said, “Therefore, write the
things which you saw, and the things
which are, and the things which are about
to take place after these things.
Jesus said the events John would be
shown were “about to take place.” We might say soon. At the end of Revelation Jesus
says again, “Yes, I am coming quickly!” I have trouble believing that the
2,000 years we have been waiting fulfill Jesus’ word “quickly.”
Although subtle, there is another thing that leads me to
believe the end Jesus spoke of foretold the destruction of Jerusalem. If we
follow the thinking of some that Jesus referred to an end that was at least
2,000 years away (as of now), we are left to imagine that all of church history
is ignored until a supposed rapture of the church brings it back into the
picture. Similarly, we must believe that John’s revelation
to the seven churches of the first century was so far in their future as to
be irrelevant. I don’t see why Jesus would give dire warnings to seven literal
churches in Asia if they would never experience the events He foretold.
I will admit that the apocalyptic prophets in the Old
Testament often spoke far in their future as well. However, if one assumes that
those prophecies foretold the end of the age that would begin with the coming
of their Messiah, Jesus’ words that the events were coming soon or quickly make
perfect sense. He did say that the
kingdom had already come in the context of His second coming aka the end of
the age. Seeing things this way makes it unnecessary to twist Jesus’ words to
fit much longer timeline than His literal statements imply. If a literal
understanding of Scripture fits with the rest of the message, don’t look for
another.
This leaves the question of when the end of this age comes.
Some people are waiting for a symbolic red heifer and a rebuilt temple with
reinstituted Old Testament sacrifices that would be profaned by the dreaded
antichrist during a seven-year tribulation period. None of that is necessary if
you take the view that it has already taken place with the crucifixion of Christ
and the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. All that needs to happen is for the
trumpet to sound, and for Jesus to come back for His church – once again. Not
three times: pre-tribulation, post- tribulation, and at the end of a millennial
kingdom on earth.
I could be wrong about all this, but I don’t think so.
Seeing the end this way does away with the need to mangle the clear meaning of
Scriptural timing, and it fits the total flow of God’s redemption plan
perfectly. I don’t have to force literal meanings on apocalyptic passages that
were never meant to be literal. I can see how John’s revelation fits seamlessly
with Daniel, Ezekiel, and Isaiah. It explains how the New Testament writers
could say the new Jerusalem is already here spiritually and not something 2,000
years plus in their future.
This is all believable to me because the kingdom Jesus
initiated is a spiritual kingdom and not a physical one ruled by Jesus from
Jerusalem. Jesus said the kingdom was already here in His day; all we are
waiting for is the
final surrender of the enemy and the complete realization of the kingdom of
Heaven on Earth. The most important thing about that is that we, the
church, are tasked with spreading the kingdom as best we can until Christ
returns to retake the throne on the New Earth. I believe that will be the end
of the church age and the beginning of an eternal age of living in God’s
presence daily. Then, my sister, the earth will be populated by ALL good people
and no bad people. I can’t wait.
Related Posts: Heaven Can
Wait; Why
Heaven Matters; Binding Satan
Many people ask how this view of the end deals with the 1,000 years – the millennium – mentioned in Revelation 20. The simple answer is that like almost all the book of Revelation, the term 1,000 years is symbolic. It occurs twice in Scripture before Revelation with the caveat that “1,000 years is as a day, and a day is as 1,000 years with the Lord.” That begs the question as to how we can say Satan is bound for his 1,000 year sentence as Revelation say in the church age. I dealt with that in “Binding Satan.”
ReplyDelete