“And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light." (2 Corinthians 11:14)
Google The Shack
and you will see what a heresy in the making looks like. Amazon says it is the Pilgrim’s Progress for this generation.
Wikipedia calls The Shack a Christian
novel. On his own web site, William Paul Young, the author of The Shack, describes himself as a
theologian and recommends another book he wrote, Lies We Believe About God, as a more systematic exposition of his
theology. There is no question that Young believes The Shack reveals the truth about God. Sadly, Young is telling an
old lie: God loves everybody too much to punish them for their sin.
One expects to find God misrepresented in secular writing
and in texts from other religions. In Star
Wars, George Lucas, for example, presents the Force as having a dark
side/light side, Yin/Yang character as in Eastern mysticism. Lucas confuses the
omnipresence of the true God with the pantheism of most Eastern religions. He
depersonalizes the God of the Bible making Him an impersonal force. The Lucas movies
are fun to watch, and one may even come to understand the biblical view of God
better by doing a little comparison and contrast study.
But no one thinks Lucas intended to reveal truth about the
God of the Bible. This is precisely what Young thinks he is doing in The Shack; he
says so on his web site. The very reason the book was supposedly written makes
this clear: he wanted to explain God to his child. This is why The Shack qualifies as heresy, while Star Wars is simply secular fiction. There
are a few Christians who have attempted to find a picture of God in Star Wars,
but you won’t find it in many church libraries. In contrast, Young’s book
probably is on the shelf of whatever church Rob Bell has landed at. Its message
would go well with the Schulerism at the Crystal Cathedral. It sells the seeker-friendly
message that warm, fuzzy theology peddles.
The people who defend Young’s incorrect theology claim he is
simply emphasizing one aspect of God’s character. They claim that God does not
love us because we follow His rules, nor does He reject us when we don’t. This
is partly true, and it is the “partly” that makes it heretical. God does love
us in spite of our sin; that part is true. The whole truth is that our
relationship with God is not based on what we have done (or not done) but on Whom
we have believed. What The Shack
fails to say is that we enter a saving relationship with God through the narrow
door of the Cross. Absent the Cross, there is no gospel. Absent the biblical Cross,
there is no possible relationship with God.
Young’s treatment of the Cross comes from what is known as
universalism. This means that everyone was “saved” when Christ paid the price
for sin on the cross. The god figure in The
Shack says that there is no need to punish people for their sin; sin itself
is its own punishment. Again, this is partly true: “the wages of sin is death,” (Romans 3:23) and sometimes the “death” begins to take its toll in life. Where Young’s
theology goes wrong is in denying the need for faith and obedience. Sin does
not simply make life on earth a little more difficult, it makes life in heaven
impossible. And those who do not go the Cross and surrender everything in faith
are doomed to an eternity in hell. That is what the Bible teaches.
If you want to know what good Christian fantasy looks like,
read C.S. Lewis’ The Narnia Chronicles.Lewis took great pains to write an allegorical fiction that perfectly mirrors
the truth presented in the Scripture. There may be others as good as Lewis, but
I am not aware of them. It is the duty of a believer to read anything with a
discerning mind to see if it aligns with Scripture, the only infallible guide
to truth. When something pretends to be about the God of the Bible, but is not
true to Scripture, it is heresy. It is dangerous heresy when it gets as widely
circulated as The Shack, and doubly
dangerous when it is so close to the truth that even sincere Christians can be
fooled. But as I said, the enemy of our souls has eons of practice deceiving
God’s elect. Don’t be fooled: The Shack
is dangerous.
No comments:
Post a Comment