The Evolution of God

Teaching creation to my fourth graders has reminded me how thin the thread is that connects us to the truth of creation by God. Adam is the closest we have to an eyewitness, even if it was immediately after the fact. We know he told his children because there is a line of his descendants who remembered their Creator. Abel did, though he didn’t live long enough to pass it on. I suspect Enoch did or he would not have been taken directly into God’s presence without having to experience death. We don’t know exactly where to put Job on the Bible timeline – either pre- or post-flood, but there is no doubt he heard who was responsible for the Creation.

Then we come to Noah. It is interesting to me that if you believe the Bible genealogy (I do), Noah’s father and grandfather would have been contemporary with Adam’s final years on earth. (See chart below.) That might explain why Noah was so very willing to put everything in the ark that God told him to build. He knew what God could do. Not many generations after the ark landed and people began to spread across the land, they decided to make their own way to god rather than listen to their Maker. At the Tower of Babel, God separated the people into different nations and chose one for Himself. Abram must have been one of the few who still believed in the Creator, or he wouldn’t have been willing to give up everything he knew and go to a land that God would show him. There God promised he would become the father of a great nation – God’s chosen nation, Israel.

Abraham’s sons, Isaac and Jacob, both had their encounters with God, encounters that apparently bolstered their belief in the God of their fathers. When God rescued Jacob’s descendants from 400 years of slavery, Moses had enough faith to believe the voice in the burning bush was indeed the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Although Israel struggled with unbelief for years, the word of the prophets confirmed again and again that it was the God who created the earth Who demanded their obedience. The Psalmists offer numerous reminders that their God was the God who named the stars. Israel’s second most important purpose (after that of bringing the Messiah to the world) was to incubate the truth that God created the heavens and the earth.

Biblical and extra-biblical history prove that humans everywhere came up with a creation story. On every continent and all the islands in between, people make up tales to explain their existence. Some of them are eerily similar to the biblical record, lending credence to the idea that it is one of the oldest. I believe that when God separated the nations at Babel, He put them in the hands of fallen angels who were in league with Satan. The Old Testament is rife with accounts of cosmic battles depicted as conflicts among “the nations.”

When Ezekiel prophesied about Egypt’s destruction, there is clear reference to Pharoah’s gods. The prophet is told to warn Pharoah that his fate will be like that of Assyria, Elam, Meshech, Tubal, Edom, and the Sidonians. The language in that chapter is clearly speaking of cosmic powers and not just human rulers. The angel who came to Daniel reported having been delayed by “the Prince of Persia,” a definite reference to a spiritual battle rather than a physical one. All ancient cultures believed in a supernatural power that held sway over their lives. We enlightened moderns have lost that awareness regrettably.

Why is the enemy so intent on directing people away from the truth about creation and God’s involvement with it? The answer should be obvious. Without a creator God, man is left to go his own way, to make his own rules. Without a sense of obligation to the one true God, people are susceptible to the lure of the demi-gods I believe are among those whom God cast out of heaven with their leader, Satan. What else could explain the mindless adherence to the fully discredited “theory” of evolution. Darwin himself admitted that if a single living cell was more complex than he imagined (he had no high-powered microscopes), his whole theory of origins would be proven false. And it has – in more ways than I can count. (See “Think About It”)

Not only has microbiology disproved the “theory” of evolution, but astrophysics has too. We now know enough to be certain that none of the theories of the origin of the universe can be scientifically supported. The popular “Big Bang” theory has a Big Flaw that few are willing to face. Even if you dare to imagine a massive particle that exploded, becoming all that we know as the universe, no one can explain where the massive particle came from. The Big Bang is not a theory of origins; it is a sidestep to avoid the truth: the universe came into existence at the word of the Creator God of the Bible. Honest scientists everywhere are leaning toward this truth with their suppositions of intelligent design. They haven’t found the God who created everything, but they have admitted finding His fingerprints.

I titled this “The Evolution of God” because human concepts of God have evolved. Ask most atheists or agnostics what they think of God, and they will come up with their own definition of who God is. The problem with that is their definition is faulty. Their “god” is not to be believed. The God of the Bible is the only one who can be believed – can be trusted. The enemy has to discredit creation because it is the basis for the Bible record of the fall and redemption. The last thing Satan wants is for anyone to discover redemption at the Cross where he was defeated.

Here’s what God said through Ezekiel about man’s evolutionary thinking: “As I live, says the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that the wicked turn from his way and live. Turn, turn from your evil ways! For why will you die, O house of Israel?” That’s how I know Satan is behind the evolution of God; he knows it tempers his defeat. He wants to take as many with him as he can. Don’t let him fool you.

Related Posts: The Patience of God; I Don’t Believe in God; Think About It; It’s Not All About You

Spare the Rod; Spoil the Child

We live in a generation that proves the truth of the ancient proverb. The evidence of spoiled children (and adults) is all around us. I am a first-generation product of the Greatest Generation, as the Depression/WWII generation was named. We Boomers, so-called because there was a boom in reproductive activity, were the first generation to experience the boom in material prosperity and increased financial opportunity generated by the massive build-up for WWII. After the war, soldiers, sailors, and airmen came home to a country bursting with possibility.

My parents had experienced severe hardship. They weathered the dual storms of the Great Depression and a world at war. They could pinch a penny so hard that Lincoln screamed. I was brought from the hospital to a house my dad built with his own hands. I rode in a second car, a necessity because Dad travelled for his business. There was always food on the table, although there was seldom steak and never caviar. My “soft drink” was mixed from a jar of syrup Mom bought from the Jewel Tea delivery man. Mom made most of the clothes my sisters and I wore, or she bought them from the Sears Roebuck sale catalogues. We had all the basics, but we were never coddled, never spoiled.

My wife and I raised our three children much the same way, although we were able to provide a few things that went beyond bare necessities. I am happy to say that as they grew and raised children of their own, they did not spoil them either. Not so with their peers. The Millennials and all the X, Y, Z gang are characterized by a sense of entitlement. I do not think it is coincidental that this is the first generation who were told that spanking was abuse. This is also the generation who attended public schools where prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance were eliminated and the Bible was banned. Time-tested, biblical methods of discipline went out the window, and lackadaisical attitude toward child rearing flew in.

I have written previously about the dumbing down of students in the public schools in America. I have witnessed such ridiculous notions as “invented spelling,” multiple test retakes, and blue ribbons for simple participation. I have seen the results of such nonsense in college freshmen. They wanted “A’s” for showing up – or even for showing up occasionally. The mistaken idea that a child will be damaged emotionally if success is not manufactured for them has created a generation who feels entitled to success without effort on their part.

This is not just an academic problem. The same distorted reality has begun to appear in the workplace. The demand for a minimum wage sufficient for subsistence exposes the belief that people are entitled to make what they need to live on no matter how menial the job. Minimum wage jobs are supposed to be platforms to learn what work is about and to build character. Then, perhaps promotion from a minimum wage job will lead to a wage sufficient for subsistence. Sadly, the Millennials expect more than what a minimum wage was intended to deliver.

That’s not all I see in the “Entitled Generation.” My part-time work after I retired revealed a class of young people who thought they deserved a paycheck whether they did their job efficiently or not – whether they showed up regularly, on time, or not. Whether the customers were the ones who were entitled to service or not. The entitlement mentality has seeped into our society so deeply that even emotional satisfaction is expected. Millennials expect to feel good at all times. If something is hard, they believe they are being abused. They are spoiled. Period.

The pitiful condition of American morality and the selfishness that characterizes so many people is a direct result of being spoiled. Everybody wants something they don’t deserve. Blacks want reparations. Illegal aliens want financial support. Criminals want immunity from prosecution. Mothers want to be rid of their unborn children. Christians want to sit in churches where they can feel good about themselves. Everybody feels entitled to something. Entitlement leads to disobedience: “You can’t tell me what I can or can’t do!”

It is hard to find biblical support for the entitlement attitude that is endemic in America today. However, it is easy to find biblical methods that would result in a proper attitude. “Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.” (Pr. 22:15 KJV) “Do not withhold discipline from the child; although you strike him with the rod, he will not die.” (Pr. 23:13) “All discipline seems… painful, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness for those who are trained by it.” (He. 12:11) “But whoever misleads one of these little ones who believe in Me, it would be better for him to have a millstone hung about his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.” (Mt.  18:6 MEV)

You may not see how the last quotation applies. My frustration with spoiled students and lazy co-workers and selfish citizens makes me wish some parents could be drowned. I think I have God’s mind on this. Referring to Israel’s disobedience, God spoke through Ezekiel: “With the fire of my wrath I destroyed them; I returned their [disobedient] way upon their head.” Through the prophet Samuel, God told King Saul: “Rebellion is like the sin of divination; arrogance is like iniquity and idolatry.” Throughout the prophecies of coming doom on wayward Israel, Yahweh says that by bringing disaster on His people, He will prove that He is God alone, and He hates disobedience.

Spoiled behavior demonstrates selfishness and pride. That is precisely what got Adam and Eve kicked out of the Garden and sentenced all of us to a life bound to sinful desires. That is what Satan brought upon the human race. Paul recognizes this when he warns: “Our struggle is not against blood and flesh, but… against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.” A proper application of the rod will decrease the necessity to wield the sword later on.

Related Posts: The Dumbing of America; Paging Phinehas Eliazar

What is the World Coming To?

Anyone with a smidgeon of moral sensitivity must be asking what is happening to the world. Jesus told the people things would get pretty awful at some point in their future. “And then many will be led into sin and will betray one another and will hate one another, and many false prophets will appear and will deceive many, and because lawlessness will increase, the love of many will grow cold.” Some people think He was talking about the end of the world which is still in our future. Others believe He was referring to the coming destruction of Jerusalem and the Jewish religious system. If that is what He meant, that is in our past. I think both could be true because there are other instances of dual fulfillment of prophecy in the Bible.

A look at the historical record shows that much of what Jesus prophesied did take place when the Romans destroyed Jerusalem after a seven-year siege. Jesus predicted that there would be wars. Rome waged war on Jerusalem. Historians record that many Jews acted treacherously during the siege, taking advantage of one another, and even going so far as to kill their children to avoid starvation. Jesus said that many would come falsely claiming to be the returning Messiah. That too is found in the historical record. I believe the events around 70 A.D. could be a fulfillment of what Jesus predicted.

I also believe that we are seeing many of the features of Jesus’ prediction in our day. The idea of many false prophets leading people into sin is sad commentary on the state of the church in the West today. One obvious example is the way some so-called Christians label other Christians as hatemongers because they disagree with their biblical interpretation. I have written many articles about the deception being perpetrated by people who call themselves Christians but deny that God forbade homosexual relationships. Another example I have mentioned previously is preachers who deny the existence of hell. They prefer not to recognize that while God is love personified, He is also a holy and righteous judge who will find it necessary to condemn some people to an existence apart from His benevolence: hell.

It is clear that the moral state of not just unbelievers, but sadly, the church fits Jesus’ prediction of the last days – whenever that may be. I will defer to my fellow believers who wish to follow the Darby/Schofield scheme of the end times. I have written about that ad nauseum for many. They may be right. I choose to believe that most of the book of Revelation is in our past. That does not mean that God cannot make similar things happen again to bring about a second fulfillment. Whatever the case, they and I believe that Jesus is coming again to judge the world. The timing of those final events is less important than belief in their finality. God will judge the earth and its inhabitants someday, and what follows will be our eternal destiny based on our earthly decisions.

I have written far too many words as an introduction to my topic. (Yes, that was an introduction.) I have been reading through Jeremiah in my through-the-Bible reading plan. I was struck by the number of times “the earth” is mentioned. There are numerous passages that seem to refer to the earth as the actual, physical ground itself. Here is one example: “For the land is full of adulterers; for the land mourns because of a curse.” Without getting too deep into the Hebrew language of the Old Testament, I will say that the Hebrew word for “land” is broad in its meaning. It sometimes clearly means dirt or earth. It sometimes refers to a land as a country. “This land is my land; this land is your land, etc. – you know the song.”

What got me thinking is that in other verses, Jeremiah uses a different word for “land” that really does mean dirt. “Turn back please, each one from his evil way, and from the evil of your deeds, and live on the land that Yahweh has given to you and to your ancestors from a long time back and until forever.” The Hebrew word Jeremiah uses for land in that verse is “adamah” which is, as you might see, the same word that God used in Genesis to explain where Adam came from – the dust. If the dirt “mourns because of a curse,” we might need to rethink our understanding of just how sentient our planet really is.

I wrote previously about Peter’s explanation of what happens on “the Day of the Lord.” That phrase is usually interpreted to mean the last day of the earth’s existence. I discovered that Peter’s prediction may not have anything to do with the physical earth. He may have been alluding to the destruction of the evil spirits that influence evil people to commit evil acts. The earth itself may be reserved for another special treatment.

I think of what Paul mysteriously said in Romans. “For the eagerly expecting creation awaits eagerly the revelation of the sons of God. For the creation has been subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of the one who subjected it in hope that the creation itself also will be set free from its servility to decay, into the glorious freedom of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans together and suffers agony together until now.” The subjection Paul refers to was initiated by Adam when he sinned. He brought the curse on the whole earth.

The “eagerly expecting creation awaits eagerly” makes it sound like creation itself is sentient. We know that Old Testament personification has trees clapping their hands, and stars singing. Jesus said that if He silenced the people on His triumphal entry, the rocks would cry out. What if all that is not just poetic language but reality we have dismissed? What if “creation” is just as anxious for the revealing of the redeemed as we are? I am looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth where I will live forever in the presence of God Himself. I believe that is what the world is coming to. Are you as eager as I am?

Related Posts: The Cry of Sin; Alternate Realties; What Happened in the Fall; Selling Heaven on Earth

Love is a Verb

Most translations of 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 use adjectives to express what love is. Paul used verbs in his original Greek. The English teacher in me sees this as a significant difference. Paul didn’t just describe what love is; he detailed what love does. This fits perfectly with his theme throughout his writing, as well as all Scripture, that actions display intentions. If I say I intend to wash my car, but never get the hose and bucket out, my intention is meaningless. If I say I have love, Paul says, but never do loving things, my love is meaningless. Worthless.

This is some of what Paul says love does in 1 Corinthians 13: 4-7:

1. Love perseveres. It hangs in there no matter how tough the going gets. If there is a desired behavior or circumstance one is hoping for, the one who loves waits patiently. My wife loves me so much that she waited patiently (for years) for me to figure out what it means to be a good husband. She didn’t stop loving me; she persevered. (Her perseverance paid off; I’m still not perfect, but through God’s grace and her loving patience, I am much better than I used to be.)

2. Love does the useful thing. Most versions translate Paul’s word as “love is kind.” The root of the Greek word he used is serviceable. That means that to love is to do what is necessary or needed in any situation. My wife had back surgery recently, and she is in a long process of healing. Out of my love for her, I have been doing things that she needs done but cannot do for herself. It would be very unkind of me to sit around and let the dishes pile up in the sink. She cannot stand long enough to wash them; I can.

3. Love does not brag or become self-important. A loving Christian understands what Paul said to the Corinthians, “What do you have that you did not receive? But if indeed you received it, why do you boast as if you did not receive it?” I don’t go around boasting about my ability as a teacher and writer. My main spiritual gift is teaching, and that is clearly a gift from God. The fact that I learned to write well is a combination of my natural talents (God given) and years of education and experience (ordained by God).

4. In that same vein, love is not self-serving. As with all spiritual gifts, mine is not given to me for my benefit. My gift is to be used for the benefit of the body of Christ. If you read 1 Corinthians 12-14 you will see that the church was making their individual gifts a matter of personal pride. Chapter 12 ends with Paul’s corrective: let love be the most important factor governing the exercise of spiritual gifts.

5. Love does not provoke another or keep an account of wrongs. My wife could have written a book of all the things I did wrong in our early marriage. If she had kept reminding me of them it certainly would have provoked me; one of my problems was pride, and if she had suggested that I was not the perfect husband, had she listed all the ways I failed her, it would not have made for a happy moment. Because she loved me with the love of God, she bit her tongue. I would offer this caution: sins borne must be forgiven and laid at Jesus’ feet or they will fester into a root of bitterness. Again, love is the antidote to bitterness.

6. Love does not rejoice at wrongdoing but rejoices at the truth. Truth is that which matches God’s design; wrongdoing is that which ignores God’s design. Sin is simply that which brings chaos whereas right living brings peace. A perfect example of this is what has happened in America with the chaos of sexual perversion that is being rejoiced over by some. Some are glad that the traditional family is being destroyed in favor of “alternative lifestyles.” They even think that such destruction is a loving thing; they call their opponents hateful. Hello Chaos.

7. Love anticipates good things. Back to my wife: she spent years anticipating my discovery of what a good husband should be like. She hoped I would learn to love her as Christ loved the church. She bore up under the disappointment I caused. This kind of love is what makes it possible to love our fellow Christians despite their unchristian behavior. Church is messy; look at the Corinthians. Someone said that church would be a fine thing if it were not for the people in it. We know that in the resurrection, we will all be glorified; until then we live in anticipation.

The prophet Jeremiah was given a message for the people of Judah: “I am Yahweh, showing loyal love, justice, and righteousness on the earth, for in these things I delight, declares Yahweh.” If we would be pleasing to God, we must be doing the right things, the things He has modeled for us. Jesus said that love for one another would be the hallmark of His disciples. Jesus was love personified. We are predestined to become like Jesus. Jesus lived love perfectly. He demonstrated that love is a verb. So, in the words of that famous advertisement: just do it.

Related Posts: Don’t be a Poser; Are You Qualified?

Slaves and Masters

In twenty-first century America, the average citizen has more freedom than anyone, anywhere, at any time in history. We have the freedom to go just about anywhere, do just about anything (within certain legal limitations), and to be whatever we have the determination to be. I just completed a 2,000+ mile trip across the country, and there was not one border check, no language barrier, nobody questioning what I was doing. (OK, some of my friends thought it was crazy to drive that distance alone in three days.) I witnessed the freedom others expressed with their disdain for speed limits and simple traffic courtesy; I was exposed to a few music choices at extreme volume in the middle of the night at rest stops; I watched people leave their cars blocking the gas pumps while they dallied in the store. These were people doing what they wanted. Regardless.

Maybe they want to be rude, lawless, inconsiderate boors. There are few people who will stop them in twenty-first century America. Fortunately, there are also people who have decided to do something with their lives to improve the condition of their fellow citizens. I was reminded of this by a random post on my Facebook page. The post noted that President Trump has surrounded himself with an entourage of pretty regular folks. He didn’t choose the usual elite snobs and self-important pooh-bahs that most Presidents have surrounded themselves with in the past. They are everyday folks willing to step in and help a President whom they believe has the best interest of the American people at heart.

I may be more sensitive to this at the moment because of a series of novels I am reading written by Cap Daniels. On the surface the heroes appear to behave like every other shoot-em-up, black ops mercenary team. But Daniels lets his patriotism and Christian belief in giving help to those who cannot help themselves come through loud and clear. Bad guys get dead and good guys get rescued, but Daniels lets the psychological and spiritual struggle come through loud and clear. One of the main characters epitomizes this dichotomy: he is a Baptist preacher when he is not using his sniper rifle to rain judgment on the villains. Daniels writes in his afterward that he detests the evil that is everywhere in our world, but he also lauds the patriots who risk their lives to make our lives a little safer.

Heaven matters most in this because every human being is a slave to something or someone. Paul writes: “Don’t you realize that you become the slave of whatever you choose to obey? You can be a slave to sin, which leads to death, or you can choose to obey God, which leads to righteous living. Thank God! Once you were slaves of sin, but now you wholeheartedly obey this teaching we have given you. Now you are free from your slavery to sin, and you have become slaves to righteous living.” (Rom. 6:16-18 NLT) We commonly think of this as referring to slaves to drugs, or sex, or money. Sinful things. Think again. Anything we do with our “freedom” that removes God from the center of our lives is sin.

Whenever we choose to fulfill our desires instead of seeking God’s desire for our lives, we become slaves to our desires. It could be a job, a hobby, or just plain laziness that enslaves us to something that is not God’s best for us. Paul says we choose to be enslaved to sin, or by choosing to give our lives to Christ, we become slaves to righteousness. We must not think of that too narrowly. It does not mean we have to give up everything and become a missionary. It does not mean we have to abandon a secular career and join the clergy. It may be those things for some, but for the vast majority of us, it is something far more mundane and, at the same time, more wonderful.

The “slave to righteous living” Paul applauds is someone who makes the effort to live according to God’s righteous principles. Jesus identified the sine qua non of His followers: that they love one another. If you have been a Christian for more than a minute, you know that the love Jesus recommended is a selfless, sacrificial love; it means caring for the other person more than for yourself. If you want to see it demonstrated, look at the Cross of Calvary. You could translate John 3:16 like this: “God loved the world in this way: He gave His Son so that anyone who believed in Him would be free from slavery to sin.”

Paul said slavery to sin leads to death; God said slavery to Christ leads to eternal life. Those of you who are as old as I am might remember a folk singer named Bob Dylan who came to Christ after a long career in secular music. One of my favorite songs of his post-conversion repertoire is “You Gotta Serve Somebody.” His lyrics list about every imaginable lifestyle and circumstance, and in every case, Dylan insists you are going to serve somebody. His theology is right there with the Apostle Paul. You may serve the devil, or you may serve the Lord, but you are going to serve somebody. And the truth is clear: there are only two choices.

The biblical concept of freedom is foreign to our modern way of thinking. N.T. Wright speaks of the paradox of Christian freedom. “We become more truly human, more genuinely free, when we are giving ourselves away. That, I think, is the clue to a whole new way of looking at the world, and perhaps at freedom itself….  Humans are made for a purpose. Only when we find and follow that purpose will we be ‘free’…. The gospel sets us free to love, to live to God’s glory, to be wise stewards of his creation and wise agents of his new creation. And at this point human freedom and divine enabling mysteriously come together.”

That is the truth, and Jesus said that the truth would set us free. He also said, “[God's]Word is truth.” For the last ten years or so I have had the blessing of “free time” every morning to read the Bible and pray. I could almost say I have become enslaved to that devotional time to the point that I am unwilling to start my day without it. Martin Luther famously said, "I have so much to do [each day] that I shall spend the first three hours in prayer." Like Luther, I read to hear God’s will; then I pray for His assistance to accomplish it – whatever it is. He is my Master; I am His slave. And I am free.

 

Solomon’s Temple; David’s Promises

We always call the temple that existed throughout the kingdom years of Israel Solomon’s Temple. I came across an interesting tidbit in 1 Chronicles 28: it says that David was given the plans for the temple directly by Yahweh Himself, and they were passed on to Solomon by David. Curious! God allowed David to see the grand design of the temple, but He died before it was completed as far as we know. That was not David’s first disappointment. Remember that Samuel anointed him as king when Saul was still reigning. David endured sixteen years of running and hiding before he finally ascended to the throne.

Solomon’s prayer at the dedication of the temple shows that he had a clear understanding of Israel’s relationship with Yahweh God, something he doubtless learned from his father. Solomon believed that Yahweh would continue to give provision and protection for His people. It was also clear from his prayer that Solomon understood the conditions under which those promises were made. He knew that Israel had to remain faithful to Yahweh and His commands or the promises would be nullified. He also realized that the nation would undoubtedly fail to fully follow God because his prayer is full of “when” clauses: when your people fail, he said, hear their repentant prayers from this temple. Not if, when.

Obviously, the omniscient God to whom Solomon prayed also knew the people would be disobedient. Regardless of this, He answered Solomon’s prayer by consuming his offering with fire from heaven and filling the temple with His shekinah glory such that even the priests drew back. This is nothing but a demonstration of God’s abundant grace in spite of His people’s repeated rebellion. Christians sometimes mistakenly think that the Old Testament God was a God of law, but the New Testament God is a God of grace. That is not true. Grace was first displayed when Yahweh did not instantly take Adam’s life when he rebelled in the Garden. It is only by God’s grace that the people of Israel ever came into being.

Because all people are prone to failure, God’s plan of redemption had to be founded on grace. The redeeming Seed promised in Genesis three could not have come to earth apart from God’s gracious provision. In the end, God did not just overlook the murderous disobedience of the Jewish leadership in Jesus’ time; He used it to accomplish His gracious purpose. This was Peter’s message on the Day of Pentecost when the Holy Spirit made everything clear to him. According to Peter, Joel’s prophecy of the last days came to pass through the “determined plan and foreknowledge of God” who used “lawless men” to execute their Messiah.

The blessing under which Solomon ruled is called the Davidic covenant. Yahweh promised David that one of his descendants would sit on the throne of Israel “forever.” When they became disobedient not only to God but to their Babylonian overseers, the judgment promised through the prophets came to pass and the last Davidic king was taken captive. When Israel returned to the land after seventy years in captivity, Zerubbabel, a descendant of David, was the political leader, but he was never called a king. He was an appointee of the Persian government that released him.

The kings we read about in the New Testament are also appointees, the Romans having taken Judea into their empire. There were a few Jewish kings during the Maccabean period, who took the throne in rebellion against Roman rule, but they were not descendants of David. By the time of the Messiah’s coming, the Herodian dynasty had been granted the right to call themselves kings, but they were puppets of Rome. They were not even fully Jewish, let alone David’s heirs. This may help us understand how significant it was to have the people hail Jesus as “Son of David” when he entered Jerusalem for the final showdown. They were anxious for a rightful heir to take back the throne.

I think it is interesting that the Roman governor, Pilate, called Jesus King of the Jews on the sign he placed upon the cross. He unknowingly announced what the prophets had foretold centuries earlier: David’s true Descendant would be king. We often say that Jesus is at once prophet, priest, and king, and so He is. He came as the Living Word; He ministers in a heavenly temple which no doubt is the pattern that was shown to David; and He reigns forever as King of kings. Although Jesus told Pilate that His kingdom was not of this world, the day is coming when the kingdom of this world will become the kingdom of Our Lord and of His Christ, and He shall reign for ever and ever.

The old covenant promised a land flowing with milk and honey – flocks, herds, abundant harvests. That covenant also required continual bloody sacrifices to atone for the inevitable sins of the people. The new covenant is built upon better promises according to the Hebrew writer. The atonement for our sins was accomplished once for all when Jesus took His own blood into the true temple in Heaven and offered it to the Father on our behalf. Jesus’ resurrection from the grave is the testimony that the offering was accepted. The torn temple veil testifies to the ending of God’s presence in the temple. That was no real loss, though. The Herodian dynasty had built a magnificent temple, but Jesus called what it truly was: a den of thieves.

The threefold nature of Jesus ministry – prophet, priest, and king – is mirrored spiritually by His body, the Church. His words, which are spirit and life to us, are prophetically passed on to us so we may share His message as ambassadors of the kingdom of Heaven. We become a kingdom of priests under His high-priestly role sharing the good news of redemption through Jesus. We enter the kingdom through His blood and rule at His side as vice-regents of that kingdom. We even share in David’s lineage because we become brothers and sisters of the true Son of David. None of this requires that we wait for the Jews to build another temple for Jesus to come. He has come, and we are His temple. We may still have disappointments as David did, but we need to learn what it means to be living in the light of David’s promises. We rule!

Related Posts: I highly recommend Where is King Jesus? And also Merry Priestly Christmas; For more on the kingdom see Thy Kingdom Come; on trials see Confidence or Craziness

Taking the Name of God in Vain

Almost everyone can quote the third of the Ten Commandments in its traditional English form, “Thou shall not take the name of the Lord Thy God in vain.” The majority of those who can quote it think it forbids cussing. Over the years, people have come up with some creative euphemisms for the phrase God damn: gosh darn, golly gee, doggone, dadgum, or just G-D. They think that by substituting a word for “god” that they have met the requirement of the commandment.

Carmen Imes in her book, Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai still matters, says that the word “take” is better understood as “bear,” as in bearing a load or an image. Young’s Literal Translation comes close with “Do not take up the name of Jehovah thy God for a vain thing.” Imes suggests that bearing the name means being identified with the named One. A modern understanding of vain in this context would be empty or useless. In other words, if you are going to bear the Name, call yourself a follower of the Name, you had better be sure the things you do honor the Name you bear.

A quick review of where the Name comes from will be helpful. Several times in the Old Testament, “The Name” appears to people as God in human form. When Moses asked what he was supposed to call the being he encountered in the burning bush, he was told to use the name Yahweh. Numerous divine epiphanies are identified as Yahweh throughout the history of Israel. In her book, Imes asks where we find Yahweh in the New Testament. She frankly states that it isn’t there unless you follow the root of the name the angel told Mary and Joseph to call their miraculous baby boy: Yeshua.

Our Savior’s parents would have spoken Aramaic, a version of Hebrew, in their daily lives. Thus, it is likely that the angel who announced His birth would have told Mary, “You shall call His name Yeshua.” We got “Jesus” from the Greek translation where Yeshua becomes Ἰησοῦς pronounced Yaysous, hence Jesus in English. If you translate directly from the Aramaic to English, you have the name Joshua. Our Saviour’s given name was Joshua. Since God regularly gives descriptive names to His special people, it is no surprise to learn that in Hebrew, Joshua/Yeshua means God saves. He does, indeed!

According to Imes, there are two reasons why the name Yahweh doesn’t easily carry over into the New Testament. First, by the time of Jesus birth, the Jews had over one thousand years of substituting “Lord” for the Hebrew name of God out of reverence for Him. Second, the writings of Moses spelled the name he was given for the God of the burning bush YHWH. In ancient Hebrew, vowels were added later to aid pronunciation; Yahweh is as close a guess as any. Jumping to Greek was difficult because there are no letters that correspond with Y, W, or H. The authors of the New Testament, who were mostly Jews, simply continued the long-standing tradition of referring to God as Lord.

Now we are back to bearing the Name. We know it is the only Name by which we can be saved, thanks to Peter’s defiant assertion. We also have a pretty good idea that many, if not all the appearances of God/Yahweh in the Old Testament were probably the pre-incarnate, eternal Son of God. So, it appears that bearing the name of Jesus in the New Testament means exactly the same thing as bearing the name of Yahweh in the Old Testament. One must take pains not to bear the name without effect. And the effect must be to glorify God.

There is another interesting sidelight to the discussion of important names in the Bible. God’s people were known as Israel because their forefather, Jacob, was given that name after he wrestled with the Angel of Yahweh. Jacob means grabber, overcomer, or usurper in Hebrew. That name is a good description of much of what occurred in Jacob’s life. After his bout with the Angel, Jacob the overcomer was renamed Israel, “He who contends with God.” In retrospect, that properly describes what the nation of Israel did throughout their existence. It has been suggested that, “[Israel] is a reference to the Jewish people's ongoing struggle with God, and the obligation they have to explore their faith.”

I can’t think of a better description of the plight of those of us who have named the name of Jesus. Paul made his own struggle plain in Romans seven. He told the Galatians that there would be a continual battle within them between the Spirit and their flesh. After commending the heroes of the faith, the Hebrew author encourages us to, “run with patient endurance the race that has been set before us, fixing our eyes on Jesus, the originator and perfecter of faith.” That “race” by the way is a marathon not a dash.

Imes says that when Jesus asked His followers to pray hallowed be Thy name, “His is prayer implies a personal commitment to honoring that name through a life of faithful obedience. He fulfills Israel’s vocation to bear Yahweh’s name with honor.” So, in one sense, the church, the Body of Christ, is the Israel of God. Our obligation is to represent His interests on earth; we are encouraged to “contend for the faith.” The church is at once the temple of God and His Israel: His contenders. This lends credence to my belief that physical Israel isn’t getting a second chance to accept their Messiah in the last days. They had their chance, and they blew it royally.

This also explains Paul’s comment to the Ephesians that God’s purpose for the church is to “Display His wisdom to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly places. This was His eternal plan, which He carried out in Christ Jesus.” (Eph. 3:10-11 NLT) It is our responsibility to bear the Name with all the best intentions and glorify God in the process. If we do that, we will not bear the Name of the Lord our God in vain. I would still recommend that you avoid cussing.

Related Posts: His Name Shall Be Called; There’s Something Fishy About that Name; In Jesus’ Name

Don’t Be a Poser

Some people are going to stand before Jesus on judgment day and insist that they did what He had asked them to do. To some He will say, “Depart from me; I never knew you.” It is not enough to say you know Christ; you must be known by Christ. “I know my sheep,” Jesus said, “and my sheep hear my voice.” The critical part of that is the voice. Jesus speaks to His sheep through His Word. The reason there will be surprised “followers” on judgment day is because many make little or no effort to read and know His Word – to hear His voice. Either through ignorance or malice, they pose as Christians but fall short of the real thing.

People who pose as Christians are not harmless. I think there are two classes of Christian posers. In one case, you have people who are doing what they have been told by other people. The problem is that they have not been told the truth. (See “Lies We Have Been Told”) For example, some people think  regular church attendance is not necessary for believers. If they mean that going to church won’t save anyone, they are correct. However, the Bible does command that we “not abandon our meeting together.” More than this, there are scores of biblical commands to do things for one another that, practically speaking, will only happen regularly in a gathering of believers.

As another example of believing what you have been told, many Christians think that the ground of their salvation is their good deeds. “I’m a good person; God will surely allow me into Heaven when I die,” according to many people. If you hear something often enough, you tend to believe it must be true. This is clearly not Bible truth. “There is none righteous, not one.” “No one good but the Father alone.” “Their deeds are like filthy rags.” That’s what the Bible says. It is also plainly stated that the only way to gain Heaven is to be found in Christ. Salvation is not about what you do but who you know. Naturally, if one truly knows Christ, good works will result, but they are a result of salvation not the cause.

These two examples show how ignorance might cause a person to think they are in Christ, but they may hear Him say otherwise at judgment. The second class of posers is more sinister: they pose as Christians knowing that their position is not biblical. Worse than that, they often deny the Bible’s authority. It baffles me why people would call themselves Christian while denying the only thing that defines Christianity. Ever since the beginning of time, Satan has been trying to get people to worship anyone or thing except the God of the Bible. The biblical record of Israel repeatedly describes the nation’s penchant for idolatry. They couldn’t seem to resist following the gods of the nations surrounding them.

At one point in Judah’s last years before captivity, they were claiming the protection of the Temple of the Lord while blatantly worshipping Queen of Heaven. Through the prophet Jeremiah, they were told that God saw them as the posers they were. He orchestrated their deportation to Babylon as promised. He explained through Isaiah that they had profaned the name of Yahweh by claiming His name while worshipping idols. There are posers today doing similar things. They explain away the miracles recorded in Scripture. They rewrite God’s prohibitions against sexual sins. They deny the historical truth of Jesus’ earthly mission. They erase God’s impending judgment of unrighteousness by preaching only His love. They preach worldly prosperity as the highest good.

These are the idol worshippers of today. They don’t have golden calves or Asherah poles in their homes. However, they worship at the altar of science that denies miraculous intervention. They worship human lust and encourage violation of God’s sacred design for sexuality. They bow to the intellectuals who don’t believe the Scripture is the inspired Word of God. They cater to the god of ease by denying the consequences of unrighteous behavior. They openly worship mammon – material prosperity – in spite of Jesus’ condemnation of it.

I should probably admit that God has been known to use posers for His purposes. Samson had all the marks of God on his life. He was born of a formerly barren mother. He was dedicated from the womb as a special class of person: a Nazarite. He was granted incredible strength which he used to hold back the Philistines in their subjugation of God’s people. However, as the record shows, he was selfish and irreverent in the use of his special gift. God accomplished His purpose through Samson, but he is definitely not a model to be imitated.

We could mention how Abraham posed as Sarah’s brother to protect her from Pharoah. Then there’s the deceitfulness that characterized Jacob’s life: stealing his brother’s inheritance rights and the blessing of their father; the subterfuge he used with Laban to obtain his large flocks. Many of the Pharisees in Jesus’ day were major posers; the Messiah called them what they were: hypocrites. But God used even them to set the stage for what was inevitably to come. Even Judas posed as a true disciple, yet his treachery was used by God to bring the Lamb of God to the sacrificial altar on Calvary.

I find comfort in knowing that in His sovereignty, God can accomplish His will with anyone He chooses. Doubtless, the people Jesus would not claim as His own in spite of their profession also accomplished some good in the world. But as we know, being good is not what earns God’s favor; it’s being known – belonging to Christ. That is why Paul said to the Corinthians, “Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith. Examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize regarding yourselves that Jesus Christ is in you, unless you are unqualified?” On the day of judgment, I want to be qualified to hear, “Well done good and faithful servant,” and not “Depart from me [you poser]; I never knew you.” You too?

Holy Cow!

When you read through the requirements for sacrifices under the Mosaic law, you might be overwhelmed by their complexity. It is understandable that the priests would have to butcher the larger animals. Even a whole 60–90-pound sheep or goat would be quite a lift onto the 7.5-foot square altar surface since it was roughly 4.5 feet high. No way a man could heft a 600–800-pound steer that high. The complex butchery comes from the detailed instructions for getting the animal ready for sacrifice. Various parts were set aside for different treatment before anything could be offered to God.

For example, some parts were reserved for consumption by the priests and their servants, the Levites. Since they had very limited flocks or herds, they needed to be fed by the contributions of the worshippers. That makes sense. But it has always puzzled me why God commanded such care be taken with the offal. Depending on the type of sacrifice, the entrails were treated differently. Sometimes they were to be burned outside the camp; sometimes they were offered as a special sacrifice.

The one that has always intrigued me is the frequent designation of the “lobe of the liver” as a dedicated offering. Today, we know this as the caudal lobe, and we know that it has a significant purpose in animal function. We also know that in Canaanite religions, the liver, and especially the caudal lobe, was used for divination. Even the ancients realized the crucial function of the liver, and they apparently surmised that the caudal lobe was special. One assumption that scholars make is that God didn’t want any confusion as to where the Israelites were to get their information: from Yahweh not from the caudal lobe of the liver.

Did you ever wonder why Jews, even today, are known for their beef brisket? Admittedly, the traditions surrounding the brisket stem from the Ashkenazi Jews (the diaspora) of the tenth century and beyond, but that connection has its roots in the regulations regarding sacrificial offerings. From the regulations in Leviticus, we learn that the brisket was often set aside for the priests. Once the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. and ritual sacrifice ceased, the Jews retained an element of the beef brisket’s special significance.

One aspect of the Levitical priestly regulations is really a mystery. Holy items were not to be taken out of the tabernacle (temple) as they retained an aura of holiness that God did not want to spread abroad indiscriminately. It is as if there was a tangible essence of holiness that could rub off on things that were not supposed to be holy. This is doubly hard for me to understand because all through the Levitical directions, Yahweh repeats the assertion that the people are to be holy. More than that, He says, “You shall keep My statutes and do them; I am Yahweh who makes you holy.” God says that numerous times throughout Leviticus. God says He makes them holy.

I struggle with the idea that God makes His people holy but restricts the movement of holy items from the tabernacle (temple). Perhaps it is just a way to emphasize the distinct holiness of the ritual furniture and furnishings. Perhaps it was meant to discourage unsanctioned worship outside of the holy place. Perhaps the holy implements and the holy garments on the one high priest were supposed to remind the people that there is only one God, and one means of access.

Obviously, none of this has any significance for twentieth century Christians. Does it? Hmm. If Christ’s body is the temple corporately, and if believers are a “a royal priesthood,” how many of the details of the temple/tabernacle regulations are we meant to reflect? One thing is obvious: there is still only one God and one way to Him. That is a message that is not accepted by many in modern cultures. There are even so-called Christians who are “offended” by the exclusivity of the biblical assertion that Jesus is the only Way to God. They can’t imagine the loving god of their own creation rejecting pious Buddhists or Hindus or Muslims. That is the same trap the Israelites fell into when they dabbled in the religious practices of the people around them.

It may also be important to remember today that to be holy means to be set aside for a particular purpose. Just as the Old Testament priests were uniquely charged with guiding people to proper worship of Yahweh, the purpose of the church (the New Testament kingdom of priests) is to represent God as the only being worthy of our worship. (See “Thanks for the Complement”) This is no small thing since moderns are just as likely to practice idolatrous worship as the ancients. (See “Who’s in the Temple”) It should make us proud to be chosen but overwhelmed with the importance of the charge we have been given. The church is supposed to reveal the mystery of God to everyone, including the rulers and authorities in the heavenlies.

The New Testament is pretty clear about the necessity of Christian witness. We are commanded to glorify God at all times in all we do. My favorite definition of “glorify” is “make God look good.” In other words, we should live in such a way that people watching us will want to get to know the God we represent. There are ways to simulate the OT priest’s outfit. Instead of a turban with “Holy to Yahweh,” we wear ball caps with crosses or biblical messages. Instead of a breastplate with twelve gems attached, we wear T-shirts with inspirational printing. Rings and bracelets and necklaces can portray Christian symbols. However, none of these things can take the place of living our faith out loud.

Evangelical Christianity does not have the ritualistic formalities of ancient Judaism. It is easy to forget the holy purpose of worshipping and living for a supremely holy God. There are Christian sacraments. The root of “sacrament” is the Latin word “sacer” which means holy. Catholics recognize seven sacraments and elevate the eucharist to an astonishing level of holiness. Most protestants hold two things as sacred: baptism and the Lord’s Supper. We are expected to participate in those rites with respect for their holy nature. But the truth is, our entire life is supposed to be a “living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God.” Instead of exclaiming, “Holy cow!” I should be able to say, “Holy You!”

Related Posts: Holy Moly!; Sanctify Them

Where is King Jesus?

We have just been through the Christmas season, and if our hearts were right, our reason for the season was the coming of the King. I must admit that the decorations in my house look more like a celebration of the coming of a jolly old elf from the North Pole. (My wife is a Claus collector.) There are a few shepherds and mangers in the mix, but like most Christmas decorations, they lean away from the true meaning of Christmas and into the shiny, silly, worldly version. In our defense, I can only say that our traditions and our memories are so thoroughly steeped in the tree and the presents and the colorful lights that even I have to remind myself what this celebration is all about: the greatest gift ever given in the form of the baby in the manger who became the King on the throne of Heaven and Earth.

Baby Jesus had to grow into His kingship. I know – He was with God and He was God from before the foundation of the Earth. But, in His unique expression as God’s earthbound Son, He had to be born and grow and ultimately become obedient unto death. It was only after His sacrificial death at Calvary that He could ascend to the throne of Heaven. The Bible reveals that because of Adam’s sin, the rulership of Earth was relinquished to God’s arch enemy, Satan. Divine justice required a human payment for Adam’s sin. That was the reason for the incarnation, the baby born in Bethlehem came to die to redeem mankind.

More than that, Paul told the Ephesians redemption was the reason for creation itself! It is truly a mystery, as Paul said, that God would create our universe knowing that His crown of the creation, us humans, would rebel and require redemption. But that is what the Book says. Paradise lost was to become Paradise regained, but only at great cost. The entire sweep of the Old Testament is a record of God moving in human history to prepare for the arrival of the Seed/Servant/Savior, Jesus. The road from Bethlehem to Calvary was posted with signs that the prophets had written centuries before.

One of the most important things the prophets foretold was that the One who was to come would be a king. So, when Jesus finally came, most of the Jewish people were looking for a conqueror king to free them from Roman oppression. They were ready when John the Baptist and then Jesus Himself announced the coming of a kingdom. It was most frequently called the Kingdom of God, but Matthew called it the Kingdom of Heaven. This implied that there was something unearthly about it. Jesus confirmed this when He told Pilate His kingdom was not of this world.

His disciples obviously missed the distinction, though. At the time of Jesus’ return to Heaven, they asked, “Lord, is it at this time you are restoring the kingdom to Israel?” I can imagine Jesus sighing deeply – maybe rolling His eyes – when He answered, “It is not for you to know the times or seasons that the Father has set by his own authority.” Times (χρόνος) or seasons (καιρός) could be translated “dates or circumstances.” He gave them a marker for the date: “When the Holy Spirit has come upon you.” The circumstances would only become clear after the Spirit had, in fact, come.

What became clear after the Holy Spirit guided them into the truth was that the kingdom was to be a spiritual reality. I believe they finally understood what Jesus had meant by saying, “The kingdom of God is within you.” If I could paraphrase what Jesus told the Samaritan woman it would sound like this: “The King of Heaven is a spirit being who requires those who would honor Him as king to do so using their spiritual faculties; physical locations are no longer important to Him.” I think He was trying to make the woman (and us) understand that true human existence is spiritual, and true worship of the One who made us in His likeness must be “in spirit and truth.”

We humans are so bound up in our time/space universe that we fail to see how a spiritual reality can be more real than our physical one. The Apostle Paul encourages us to think of earthly things, material things as temporary (temporal: time-bound) and passing away to be replaced by more permanent things – spiritual things. His explanation to the philosophers in Athens was that the true God did not have a physical existence as represented by their idols and related sacrifices. Rather, he said the true God made the world and everything in it, and that it is in him we live and move and exist.

The teachings of Jesus and Paul are clear: we all exist in God in one sense, but God in us only applies to those who take their place in the Son. Jesus’ disciples must have been horrified when He told them He was going away; then they were mystified when He said it would be better if He went away. What could be better than walking through life in Jesus’ physical presence, they must have asked. The answer came to them with the coming of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. Once they were filled with the Spirit, they understood what Jesus meant by fulness of life – completeness of joy. They soon learned that they also had been given power to do Jesus’ work – first twelve of them, then thousands, then millions of them.

We are among those millions, those of us who have given our lives to Christ, those of us who hail Him as King Jesus. We are ambassadors of the one true King speaking into the darkness of this world, “Be reconciled to your King; escape the darkness and enter the Kingdom of Light.” Today that kingdom is a spiritual reality, true enough. But we look forward to the day when all creation will be remade; heaven and earth will be reunited at the return of the King. But you won’t enjoy Him as King then if you don’t accept Him as King now. It is the question of the ages: where is King Jesus?

                                   

Related Posts: The Virgin Shall Conceive;  Toasting Christmas; Merry Priestly Christmas; Despising the Down Payment; Happy Birthday to Me

Alternate Realities

I have just finished reading Philip Yancey’s Rumors of Another World: What on earth are we missing? Yancey’s thesis is that most people, even Christians, don’t live as if there is another world out there somewhere. They live as if this world is the ultimate reality. It is not uncommon for unbelievers to live as if this is all there is; many assume that when they die, they simply cease to exist. What concerns me, as Yancey suggests, is that many believers act as if there is no life after death – no other world to which they will go when they die.

This mistaken attitude is one of several common misunderstandings that are the result of a failure to think Christianly about everything. Another way to say this is that one’s world-view is not thoroughly Christian – not biblical. Paul said believers are supposed to see this world as temporary, passing away. We are supposed to see ourselves as pilgrims, sojourners passing through this world on our way to another. Rumors of that other world are all around us, according to Yancey. That unbelievers fail to see them is forgivable; that believers miss the truth is not.

First, look at the word reality. The Oxford Dictionary defines it as “the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.” The “state of things as they exist” to most people refers to this world. Yancey’s point is that most people, even Christians, believe this world is the only “reality.” To these people, heaven is an “idealistic or notional idea.” To unbelievers, heaven is a foolish notion, but sadly, to many believers it is hardly more than an idealistic hope for something better someday – pie in the sky by and by.

The concept of being in the world as opposed to somewhere else (heaven or hell, for example) appears all over the New Testament. In the Gospels, Jesus regularly warned of a time to come when those who believed in Him and those who did not would find themselves in radically different realities. Believers would be welcomed into His presence while unbelievers would be cast into a dark place with “weeping and gnashing of teeth.” Paul wrote of being taken to another reality to receive special revelation. He also told the Corinthians and the Ephesians that believers’ true enemy was not from this world.

While I am not a strict dispensationalist as the word is used today, I do believe that the Bible often refers to ages which have different conditions. The Old Testament prophets spoke of a coming day when the Messiah would usher in a dramatic new age. The New Testament speaks often of ages. This age, the coming ages, and interestingly, Paul equates “world” with “age in Corinthians” and in Ephesians. I believe this is important because it implies that our created reality, the world as we know it is just one “age” or time period in God’s overall plan for us. The resurrection all believers look forward to will be into that rumored “world” Yancey wrote about. I have described previously what I believe about that new world in “When Destruction is not Destruction.”

Most Christians believe they will go to heaven after they die. While I agree with that sentiment in principle, I see the situation differently than some. I believe heaven and earth will become one – a restored Eden if you will. So, the “heaven” that I imagine will be a reality that combines all the best of God’s good earth with all the best of Heaven. It is not so much an alternate reality as it is a perfected reality. Heaven and earth exist for this age as intersecting realities; after Jesus returns, I believe the two will become one reality. I believe the Bible teaches that we must begin to live as if Heaven is real because it is.

 How can we make heaven more real? Hear what A.W. Tozer says: “God is a Person and in the deep of His mighty nature He thinks, wills, enjoys, feels, loves, desires and suffers as any other person may. In making Himself known to us He stays by the familiar pattern of personality. Religion, so far as it is genuine, is in essence the response of created personalities to the Creating Personality, God, [so that Jesus could say] ‘This is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.’”

Jesus, the God who created this world, descended from “heaven” and became flesh to show us what true reality is. If we can avoid the notion that Jesus is some far distant historical figure and fully adopt the idea that He lives today, both in us and in heaven, and if we can convince ourselves that He is a person like us in many ways, we may move closer to a proper view of reality. I believe that is the alternate reality we are called to.

Related Posts: The Presence of God; Waiting for Morning; Friendship with the World; Think, People!; Deer Camp Philosophy; Why Am I Here?; Is Heaven a Wonderful Place?

Are You Qualified?

My title is drawn from two commands Paul makes in 2 Corinthians 13:5. Most translations of the Bible read, “Test yourselves… examine yourselves” or they reverse the two imperatives saying, “Examine yourselves… test yourselves”. In the Greek, the first imperative is a different word from the second. Either one may be translated test or examine which explains why translators have difficulty differentiating between them. The difference I find is in the subsequent verses. Paul uses forms of the second word four more times in the next two verses.

This is not just a trivial linguistic issue in my opinion. The first command asks the Corinthians to test or examine themselves “to see if you are in the faith.” What he means is to see if you are truly a believer, one who is “in the faith.” Throughout church history, there has been a debate over how people can know if they are saved – “in the faith.” It is glaringly obvious that the Corinthian church had people who claimed to be in the faith but acted very much like those who were not – like unbelievers. The two letters we have from Paul to the Corinthians are full of correction and rebuke. He certainly questioned the legitimacy of their belief.

One could ask whether the Corinthians believed Paul’s message at first (got saved), but later they stopped believing (lost their salvation). The answer to this question generally comes from one of two perspectives: either Calvinist or Arminian. (I wrote about this in some detail in “Calvinist or Arminian”) The Calvinist position holds that once a person is saved, it is not possible to lose salvation: once saved; always saved. The Arminian view is that everyone makes a conscious decision to be saved and can therefore decide to be “unsaved.”

This passage may be Paul’s entrance into the debate. I say this because of the second word he wrote in verse five. Whereas test or examine is a fair translation of the first of his commands (πειράζω), the word he used in the second command is dokimazō (δοκιμάζω) which may legitimately be translated “qualify.” The fact that he used forms of this word repeatedly in the rest of the passage leads me to think he meant “to qualify” rather than test or examine. An alternative translation of Paul might read, “Qualify yourselves! Or do you not recognize regarding yourselves that Jesus Christ is in you, unless you are unqualified? And I hope that you will recognize that we are not unqualified! Now we pray to God that you not do wrong in any way, not that we are seen as qualified, but that you do what is good, even though we are seen as though unqualified.”

In the larger context, Paul had been asserting his qualifications as an apostle. At this point, he told the Corinthians not to concern themselves with his qualifications but to look to their own condition. In the end, the only thing that mattered was if they were qualified as believers. So, the question becomes what Paul says qualifies one as a believer. They claimed to be “in the faith,” or in Christ. Paul insists that to qualify as a believer, Christ must be “in them.” As he said to the Colossians: “Christ in you the hope of glory.”

The important question one must ask is what kind of faith qualifies one to say, “Christ is in me.” Paul told the Roman believers, “But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, this person does not belong to him. But if Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin, but the Spirit is life because of righteousness. And if the Spirit of the one who raised Jesus from the dead lives in you, the one who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also make alive your mortal bodies through his Spirit who lives in you.”

This was Jesus’ promise to His disciples on the night He was betrayed. He prayed to His Father, “that they may be one, just as we are one – I in them, and you in me, in order that they may be completed in one, so that the world may know that you sent me, and you have loved them just as you have loved me.” Just before this prayer for His disciples, He had told them, “If you keep my commandments, you will remain in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commandments and remain in his love…. This is my commandment: that you love one another just as I have loved you.” The quality of faith that proves Christ is in you is a faith that loves selflessly, agape love, the love of Jesus. This reminds me of what James said: “Faith without works is dead.”

It should be no surprise that we are called to obey Jesus; life in Christ is a “long obedience in the same direction,” according to Eugene Peterson. That direction is conforming our life to the life of Christ. In his book Rumors of Another World, Philip Yancey asserts that, “Those who invest their hope in an unseen world prove it by their actions in this world…. putting feet to Jesus’ prayer that God’s will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” If we are in Christ and Christ is in us, we must continue His work doing His Father’s will.

None of this should suggest that once I am “qualified” I am good for eternity. In the same way that I had to fulfill continuing education requirements to maintain my teaching certificate (qualifications), believers must continue to affirm their qualifications by continuing to grow up into maturity in Christ. The essential quality of maturity is demonstrating selfless love to a greater and greater degree.

One wonders how this quality of faith affects the quality of one’s life here on earth. Yancey quotes Albert Schwietzer: “The only [people] who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve.” It is no coincidence that throughout the Old Testament prophets, the promised Messiah is called God’s Servant. He shocked His disciples at the “Last Supper” by washing their feet and proclaiming that servanthood was to be the hallmark of His disciples. Jesus said He, “came not to be served, but to serve.” I believe that one important qualification for saying you are “in Christ” is servanthood. Are you qualified?

Related Posts: Necessary Obedience; Weak-day Christians

Get Foolishness

The ancient wise king instructed his son: “Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore, get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.” A few chapters later he added, “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.” So, to truly understand what wisdom is, we must begin with the fear of the Lord. To fear the Lord in this context means to honor and respect Him. The best way we mortals can do that is to delve deeply into His Word, perhaps meditating on it day and night as the psalmist recommended.

What we learn through the process of study and meditation is that there is more than one type of wisdom. When Paul described his approach to the Corinthians, he said his message was founded on Christ, “the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom.” Human wisdom is described by James as, “earthly, unspiritual, demonic.” The word James used for “unspiritual” is usually translated as “soulish.” The human soul is comprised of intellect, emotion, and volition. James implies that the wisdom that appeals to the intellect is of this world as opposed to from heaven. More frightening is his assertion that human wisdom can be demonic. That is not surprising since the human soul is often the playground of the devil.

One of the devil’s favorite tricks is to mess with believers’ minds. According to Paul, we are supposed to be aware of his schemes, but too often, that is not the case. In the Screwtape Letters, C.S. Lewis creates an imaginary dialogue between a demon and his protégé. The subtlety Lewis imagines is evidence of demonic wisdom. He doesn’t suggest tempting Christians with outright unrighteousness; rather he advises getting them to doubt the wisdom of God’s plan. It sounds like the serpent in the garden: “Did God really say…. Surely, he didn’t mean it.”

So, we have Paul saying that the gospel is the wisdom of God. I must admit, at first glance, the gospel seems like a crazy idea. I can’t imagine hearing God say, “I know; let’s send my only Son to earth and have Him killed.” It’s not just crazy; it’s inhumane. What human would sacrifice a child for a bunch of reprobates? We would be inclined to agree with Fredrich Beuchner: “If the world is sane, then Jesus is mad as the hatter, and the Last Supper is the mad tea party.” (from The Faces of Jesus) But since we believe the Bible is truth, and God is all-wise, we must be missing something.

What is it in the monstrosity of the Cross of Calvary that makes it the epitome of wisdom? In his second letter to the Corinthians, Paul announced that anyone “in Christ,” meaning anyone who identified with His death in Christian baptism, is a new creation: the old has passed away; the new has come. What does Paul mean by the old and new? The old way, the old covenant, is superseded by the new covenant initiated with Christ’s death. (Heb) The new covenant was instituted to reconcile the world to God, Paul says. “God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them.” Reconciliation implies a separation that must be reversed. That world-changing separation occurred when Adam rebelled against God and brought “death” to humanity. So, the act of reconciliation requires regeneration. Paul told the Ephesians, “We being dead in trespasses, he made alive together with Christ.” Paul made the astounding declaration to the Corinthians that God had entrusted the message of reconciliation “to us,” adding the analogy of us being ambassadors of Christ, begging the world (unbelievers) to be reconciled to God.

I have mentioned previously that we have the awesome privilege of revealing the age-long mystery of God to the “rulers and authorities in the heavenly places.” Add to this our status as ambassadors of Christ to the world and you have the complete answer to the universal question: why are we here? The church is a physical demonstration of God’s love for His creation and a platform for delivering the love-based message of reconciliation to the lost and dying world. Remember, God so loved the world that He [insanely] gave His only Son to save it. The wisdom of God is indeed foolishness to [some] men.

Paul used this idea sarcastically on the Corinthians when he pointed out their false wisdom: “We are fools for Christ’s sake,” he said, “But you are wise.” Satan was apparently using one of his favorite schemes on the Corinthians, inciting their pride so that God’s wisdom looked foolish to them. Here we see another possible meaning for the “new” thing Paul mentioned. Most people who read 2 Corinthians 5:17 believe that the new thing is the creation: us. This is clearly an honest reading. Although creation itself still groans under the weight of sin, Paul said believers rise from baptism to a new life. He counsels us to put off the old man and put on the new. He also makes it clear that this human newness is not a one-and-done deal; we are “being made new,” a present progressive reality.

So, if one of God’s first and best evangelists was considered foolish, even by some who called themselves Christians, it is no wonder that the twenty-first century world thinks believers are crazy or naïve or deluded. We must become firmly grounded in the wisdom of God so that we can stand against the fiery darts of the accuser when we are called foolish. We must take Paul’s approach: if we look foolish it is because we are fools for Christ’s sake. It would be a good thing if more of us embraced foolishness now and then.