I’m reading Philip Yancey’s book titled, Prayer: Does it Make a Difference? Page
after page, I am struck by his insightful questions, although I expect to be
disappointed by the absence of answers. Yancey admits this will be the case
early in his ruminations. Still, I am reading on because the discussion about
prayer and the examples of fellow-prayers draw me in.
At one point Yancey quotes Walter Breuggmann amid a
discussion of the candor evident in many of the prayers we know as Psalms.
Breuggmann says the candor is necessary because, “life is like that, and these
poems are intended to speak to all of life, not just part of it.” He finds is
jarring that modern worship songs are nearly all “happy songs,” a fact that
seems to him to be inconsistent with the proportion of not-happy songs found in
the Bible songbook known as Psalms.
The presence of happy songs is no surprise given the
tendency of many modern Christians to believe that happiness is one of the
benefits of being a believer. I discussed this sad misunderstanding previously
(see Happiness and Joy), so I won’t belabor the point here except to say that I believe
it is important for Christians to learn the difference between happiness versus
joy. (Yes, Randy, there is a difference.)
I found myself agreeing with Brueggmann and going a step
further: not only are most of our popular songs upbeat, they are almost
universally written in first person singular (1PS). Ten of the top fifty
Christian songs on Billboard today have the words “I, Me or My” in the title. At
least that many more speak in 1PS, though it is not in the name of the song. Of
the remaining songs, the majority speak in second person singular (2PS) as they
are directed to God. A recent survey by song licensing agent, CCLI, reveals
fourteen of the top twenty-four most popular songs in churches are in 1PS.
At first blush, this
may not seem terrible: we sing about our personal relationship with God, so 1PS
and 2PS are the most likely points of view. “Good, Good Father” is a perfect
example: You (God) are this; I am that. There is nothing wrong with that in and
of itself. However, if all I sing about is me and God, a large part of what it
means to live as a Christian is missed. While a personal relationship with
Jesus is essential, that relationship ultimately places me in a body, His Body,
the Church.
Immediately someone will mention, “If We Are the Body” by
Casting Crowns. But that song is a rebuke, and I don’t recall having heard it
sung in church. Certainly, there are other examples of songs that speak to or
about the corporate experience of being a Christian. However, as surveys show,
they are not predominant by any measure. I suspect that the majority would also
be “happy” songs as well.
This mistaken tendency to be self-centered and
happiness-focused is not trivial. Jesus said the entire law of God rests on
two commands: love God; love your neighbor as yourself. The self is to be taken
to the cross daily, Jesus said elsewhere. James counselled that true religion
is other-centered. Peter asks us to rejoice in trials. In Ephesians and 1
Corinthians Paul makes it abundantly clear that the gifts of ministry are given
to individuals for the benefit of the body, not the individual.
Despite what the Alcorns and Bells of the world say,
Christianity is not all warm fuzzies and happiness, at least not the
Christianity that is portrayed in the New Testament. The joy (not happiness) we
have is the joy Jesus had: He looked toward the joy “despising the shame"[and torture] of the cross. Over 50 “one-anothers” in the Bible call us to
turn our vertical love for God into a horizontal love of those around us. First
of all, Paul says, toward those of the household of faith (Gal. 6:10).
We need to keep singing those songs about the wonder of our salvation,
but not neglecting to remember what our salvation is for. We were saved for a
purpose: to love our neighbor. First those who sing around us, then those who
dwell in the darkness just outside our church door. They need to know why we are singing.
No comments:
Post a Comment