Child at 13 weeks |
This is good news and bad news. The ruling does remove the
wrongheaded assumption that the Constitutional right to privacy includes the
right to murder unborn children. That’s good news. The bad news is that there
will undoubtedly be states that find “a rational basis” for abortion that
serves “legitimate state interests.” Convenience will still trump the sanctity
of life in some people’s mind. If a state decides that it would be rational to
end a pregnancy through abortion to preclude the possibility of having to pay
for an unwanted child, legitimate state interests could be claimed.
What the overturn of Roe v. Wade did not do is clear up the
underlying question of when human rights begin to apply to a fetus, the
question being whether an unborn baby is truly human. As a Christian, there can be
no question because the Bible repeatedly asserts that the life of every human
being exists in God’s mind even before conception. Psalm
139 states this most clearly:
“Indeed
you created my inward parts;
you wove
me in my mother’s womb.
Even if we didn’t have the Bible to rely on, there is good,
logical reason to believe human life begins at conception. The DNA in the sperm
and egg are human DNA. The entity that issues from the fertilized egg can be
nothing but human. There is no question there. Ignoring this, the courts have
struggled for the last fifty years to decide whether there is a point of
viability at which a fertilized egg becomes human. Viability is taken to mean
the ability to exist outside the womb which is really a question of where a
thing exists not what it is essentially.
When developing
in the womb, the unborn baby gets its life-giving oxygen from its mother’s
blood. Once the baby’s umbilical cord is severed, the baby’s lungs take over
the function of providing oxygen. This simple change in the source of oxygen
does not signal a transition from not-human to human. A baby does not change physically
when it takes its first breath. It is also true that every creature that exists
on land breathes air; every creature is not therefore human. The breath of life
argument doesn’t hold up.
Another argument for assigning human-ness at the point of
conception might be called an argument from potentiality. A kernel of corn
placed in the ground becomes a stalk of corn. A planted acorn becomes an oak
tree. A fertilized chicken egg becomes a chicken. A fertilized cow ovum becomes
a cow. Corn doesn’t produce oak trees; chicken eggs don’t hatch cows. A
fertilized human egg cannot become anything but a human. The real argument
today is whether all humans, including the unborn, have equal rights under the
law.
Bioethicists are beginning to argue that despite the
presence of human-ness, some classes of persons might justifiably be denied
human rights. Unwanted or premature babies, mentally deficient children and
adults, people debilitated by the process of aging can all be considered less
than human and not deserving the rights granted to “fully human” beings. This
is a very dangerous line to follow, but it has credibility among those people
who are utilitarian or pragmatic in their philosophies. It can also be used in
the “legitimate state interest” argument: a person who cannot contribute to
society in any meaningful way should not be granted full human rights and
become a burden to the state. Terminating those humans would be a benefit to
the non-terminated humans. Unwanted pregnancies can be terminated for the good
of society, so they say.
As of 2019 (the latest year with statistics since Roe v.
Wade in 1973) there have been 63,459,781
aborted fetuses in the United States. Over 63 million human beings have been
thrown in the trash. That is a national tragedy that underscores the shift in
this country away from Judeo-Christian principles. Many state legislatures will
find their own way to provide abortion rights similar to Roe v. Wade. As I have
written previously, the decoupling of procreation from sex with the easy
availability of birth control hastened the rise of promiscuity and placed the
institution of marriage in second place behind physical gratification. The push
to redefine gender and marriage further weakened the biblical institution.
We have good reason to celebrate the reversal of Roe v.
Wade. Christians should not abandon the battle for the sanctity of life,
however. The front lines have now been moved to the state legislatures making
it more difficult in some ways. Instead of a single pro-life march on
Washington, we will now need to approach lawmakers in every state that tries to
reinstate abortion à la Roe v. Wade. This
is just one front in the culture war Christians should be engaged in. Although
our true enemy is “spiritual
wickedness in the heavenlies,” our enemy on the ground is apathy.
Christians are no longer the majority in many areas. However, if we voted as a
bloc, we could have significant influence on policy especially at the local
level.
Say a prayer of thanks that the devouring lion of Roe v.
Wade has been defanged. Stay on your knees, however, and continue praying that
the one “looking
for someone to devour” will be held back in other critical areas. Then get
off your knees and do something. Saint
Augustine is supposed to have said, “Pray like it all depends on God and
work like it all depends on you.” That’s great advice.
Related posts: Whose War
on Women?
No comments:
Post a Comment