Political Exhaustion

Robert B. Charles made an insightful point in his post in the AMAC newsletter after the 2024 Presidential election, “Prepare for Emotional Exhaustion.” His main point was that after fighting long and hard on whichever team you play for, post-election catharsis is inevitable – exhaustion. I am certainly tired of the political ads that filled the airwaves for the last several months. They seem so pointless to me. I don’t know anyone who makes a voting decision based on advertising. Thoughtful people have better ways to examine the candidates and form an opinion. This was especially true this season because one party repeatedly made numerous false, defamatory accusations and the candidate was usually unable to articulate a cogent position on anything. I am particularly tired of that!

But it was Charles last point that really struck me. He wrote, “In this case, the election was brutal, arguably off-base, historically out of line with American politics.” Brutal: repeated impeachment threats, multiple lawsuits, and two assassination attempts against Donald Trump are definitely “off-base.” Like out of the ballpark off-base. He said they were “out of line with American politics,” but I have to disagree, sadly. Politics in this country has become increasingly partisan and divisive. Part of the reason for this, in my opinion, is the emotional factor being employed: scaring seniors with false threats to their Social Security, making pro-choice voters think abortion would be criminalized (as perhaps it should be), predicting huge increases in the cost of living all played on emotion rather than offering rational policy solutions.

I am aware that as far back as the election of George Washington, candidates tossed political firecrackers at one another. It seems that now they are using hand grenades and IED’s. When anyone calls their opponent Hitler for nothing worse than a policy disagreement, we have gone a step too far. When one party’s supporters attempt to assassinate their opponent, we have abandoned the American way of free expression of political ideas in the most egregious way. And when a candidate tells someone at her rally that the Christian message on a sign shows that the person is at the wrong rally, religious freedom is also being attacked, and a philosophical viewpoint is being proclaimed.

As Christians, we don’t have to insist on electing only fellow believers. What we must insist on is that any candidate we consider voting for cherishes freedom of religious expression. I have written previously that religious freedom is under attack by the progressives in this country. I have warned as Martin Niemöller did during WWII that if we don’t speak out against religious discrimination now, we will eventually forfeit the right to speak at all. There are already signs that the silencing process has begun.

It is now considered hate speech and punishable criminal behavior to use the wrong pronoun in reference to a person suffering from gender dysphoria in many public schools. Many employers threaten termination of persons who express religious opinions that are not appreciated by a fellow employee. The right to stand on a public sidewalk a respectable distance from an abortion clinic and protest the murder of the unborn is a chargeable offense. Wearing a tee shirt with a religious message to a public school will almost certainly get the student sent home, and discipline up to expulsion is not unusual. Need I continue?

The damage that the progressives are inflicting on the First Amendment is not their only attack. Second and Fourth Amendment rights are being trampled on a daily basis. Their explanation for these infringements reveals a fundamental difference in the Constitutional views of the two political parties. Most Democrats believe the Constitution must be continually revised to account for changes in cultural norms and expectations. Most Republican jurists hold the view that the document that governs us was written in such a way that all eventualities can be judged by its historical form. The way this works out is the Democrats are constantly reinventing meaning while the Republicans seek to understand the original meaning of the Founding Fathers.

The Bible teaches us to obey the law, submit to earthly authority, honor those to whom honor is due, and pay our taxes, etc. Despite all the naysayers, America was founded on Judea-Christian values. Those values are enshrined in our Constitution. Rewriting it or ignoring it when it restricts some newly discovered freedom (like freedom to murder innocents) is precisely what the progressives want. As Christians, we ought to be deeply concerned when the foundations of the Founding Fathers are being dynamited. I believe we elected a protector of religious freedom yesterday. If you were praying for that eventuality, don’t stop praying now. Like Robert B. Charles said, you may be exhausted, but I say you need to stay alert and keep praying because the roaring lion hasn’t been caged – he might be fettered, but his reach is still extensive. As the song says, “We are strongest when we are on our knees.”

Related posts: And Freedom for All; How to Boil a Frog; What Price Freedom?; What Does it Mean to be an American?; Strict Obedience

Vote! Please!

After all the rancor surrounding the 2020 Presidential election, I vowed to concentrate my writing on general Christian living and Bible teaching. However, today, three days before the 2024 election, I feel I have to say something. Every national election is important to a degree, but this one will have monumental consequences for everyone, not just Christians.

If you are like me, you are so DONE with political advertising. I wouldn’t be as fried if the candidates were actually outlining their policies; they could even differentiate their views from their opponents, and I wouldn’t mind as much. Unfortunately, neither party is spelling out much of what they plan to do in any detail. In my market (Arizona) the only issue that seems to matter to the Democrats is abortion. They are making outrageous claims to frighten pro-choice voters onto their side. If you read my blog during the last election, you know that I cannot abide the Democrat position that a woman has the right to murder her unborn child. It is seldom wise to vote on a single issue for something as wide-ranging as presidential authority, but I would be remiss if I didn’t say that a vote for the Democrats is a vote for murder.

Polls indicate that there are two main issues voters in this election care most about: the economy and the border. By “economy” I suspect that most people mean inflation. A true measure of prices for things everyone needs to live has gone up between 17% and 20% over the last four years. If you didn’t know this, you must not do the shopping in your house. Harris has said that there are no Biden policies she wound change. You have to decide if that is good for your budget or not. One thing is certain: we cannot afford to bring unlimited numbers of immigrants into this country and give them financial help when we are already struggling under significant inflation and tremendous national debt. (For more on that, read “Man the Lifeboats.”)

Unbridled immigration is a more complex problem than just its economic effect, and the positions of the two parties are clear to anyone who listens. Most of Trump’s immigration policies were reversed by Biden as soon as he took office. He installed Harris as his border czar, and the disaster that ensued is undeniable. The most frightening thing about their current position on immigration is their insistence that non-citizens (illegal aliens) be allowed to vote. This strikes at the heart of our representative government. Only legal stakeholders should have a say in government policies. True, the Democrats are making illegal aliens stakeholders by granting them living assistance of every kind. But to my mind, that just doubles down on the original mistake of letting so many come across the border. They become guaranteed Democrat voters to keep their gravy train running.

Another issue that is flooding the airwaves in my area concerns Social Security positions. The Democrat ads shamelessly mislead seniors by claiming that Trump would cut their retirement benefits. It is true that Trump (and most Republicans) realize that if something isn’t done to reform Social Security, it will implode in the near future. However, to scare seniors now collecting benefits by suggesting that Trump would reduce their checks is a bald-faced lie. None of his policies that I am aware of affect current beneficiaries. His plan would raise the age of initial eligibility and offer a hybrid investment plan with individual control of one’s own money. The kind of changes Republicans are suggesting are necessary to save Social Security for the long run. The Democrats have no such plan. (For more on my take on SS, see “Social Insecurity”)

Finally, independent, non-biased accounting estimates that the goodies Harris promises if she is elected would inflate the national debt by trillions of dollars. If you don’t understand why the national debt is your problem, read “Imaginary Money.” Using a household budget as an analogy, our current situation is like having so much debt that you have to pay every penny you earn to cover the interest – just the interest; you would not be paying one penny on the principle, and there would be no money for food, fuel, clothing, and anything else that you need to survive. It is a sad commentary on the intelligence of American voters that we have come to this untenable position. Our entire system is hanging by a thread, and Harris wants to add more weight to the burden.

Many people were dissatisfied with Trump as a person back in 2016 and 2020. They wouldn’t vote for him because they didn’t like him. As I wrote then, the Presidential election is not a popularity contest: I like her better than him (Nah-nah). On one important level, the United States is the world’s largest business entity. Donald Trump has proven to be a very successful businessman. His term in office gave ample evidence that his expertise transfers to his position as President. He also professes faith in God, and he would never tell someone at his rally (as Harris did) that they were in the wrong place because they were supporting Christian values. If enough conservative voters abstain because they don’t “like” Trump, they will assure the election of Kamala Harris.

This short piece will not likely change many votes. Many people have already voted early, and those who have not yet cast their ballot will probably not be convinced to change. My only hope is that I may encourage someone to vote – either way – so that our next President represents the citizens properly. By that I mean properly elected by a majority of informed, legal citizens. The next four years will be radically influenced by who wins the top of the ticket.

Related posts: Vote Anyway; Politics Stinks; Honor the King; The Circle of Well-being

What Were You Given?

Some time ago, I wrote an article called, “God’s Choice or Man’s.” If you have not read it, or you are uncertain about God’s sovereign election unto salvation, I recommend that you pause and follow the link now. (Also see Related Posts below.) If you are ready to consider the ramifications of God’s sovereign dealings with people in all things, let me present an interesting facet of that condition.

In the Gospel of Matthew, chapter thirteen, the disciples ask Jesus why He so often speaks in parables. He responds, “Because the secrets of the kingdom of heaven have been given for you to know, but it has not been given to them.” (Italics mine) At first glance, it may seem that God is being unfair or even capricious. That is until you remember that He told Isaiah that he would be sent to people who would see but not see and hear but not hear. It proved true. Despite numerous warnings of what was to come of Israel’s disobedience and idolatry, they were taken captive to Babylon for seventy years. Isaiah warned them; they refused to hear.

Jesus quotes from that context to explain His use of parables. From our perspective, we look back and see that the Jewish leaders had to reject Jesus as Messiah, or they would not have crucified Him which was God’s intended purpose from the beginning. That in itself is a bit hard to understand, but it is exactly what Peter told them after Jesus’ resurrection. A sinless One had to give Himself as the atoning sacrifice for all mankind. In a weird sort of circular irony, it was the very people He came to save who crucified their Savior.

Think again about the concept of God’s sovereignty. Not only does He rule over all, He has the power to accomplish His will without exception. A few of the Jewish religious leaders were given the secrets, as Jesus explained, but not the majority. Remember Nicodemus, Jesus’ night visitor and Joseph of Arimathea who loaned Jesus his tomb for three days; they were two of the elite who got it. Read the Gospels and notice how Jesus could win converts throughout Galilee, but He was driven from His hometown because of their unbelief. The secrets of the kingdom are given as God wills.

Noone who reads the Scriptures carefully can deny that God chooses His people for His own reasons. One may ask how the concept of sovereignty plays out in the lives of those who have been given knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom. Why were James and Stephen martyred early in the church’s establishment, but many other first-generation disciples ministered for many more years? Why was Saul allowed to capture and kill so many followers of the Way before God finally gave him the secrets of the kingdom, after which he suffered numerous trials including being stoned and left for dead? Why was John boiled in oil (so tradition says) and then exiled to the island of Patmos?

Then there is the curious fact that although Jesus told His closest disciples He was going to die and rise again, they didn’t understand. That has always puzzled me until I read Jesus’ words in Luke: “‘Let these words sink in: The Son of Man is about to be betrayed into the hands of men.’ But they did not understand this statement; it was concealed from them (Italics mine) so that they could not grasp it, and they were afraid to ask him about it.” Apparently, there are some secrets that are not given for all to know. God has His reasons.

In the Gospel of Luke, the narrative that follows Jesus’ explanation for the parables is the one about putting your lamp on a stand rather than hiding it. Jesus closes the parable saying, “For nothing is secret that will not become evident, and nothing hidden that will never be known and come to light. Therefore, consider how you listen, for whoever has, to him more will be given, and whoever does not have, even what he thinks that he has will be taken away from him.” That is a frightening thought. Not only does God give to whomever He chooses, He takes away too.

Job knew this; he said, “The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away. Blessed be the name of the Lord.” Consider this: maybe that was also the point of the parable of the sower. Jesus said the seed is the Word of God. The Word is sown by God’s grace through human agency. Then the all-knowing, all-powerful God allows some to be taken away by various means: shallow hearts, worldly concerns, and the devil’s schemes. This may also be what the Hebrew writer meant when he said that some would fall away after having, “tasted the good word of God.” It could be that those taste-testers were in one of the categories Jesus mentioned in the parable of the sower.

If you are one to whom it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom – if you have tasted the good word of God, make every effort to see that the soil of your life is deep and kept watered. To do that you must spend time with the written word and commune often with the Living Word. If you fail to do that, you risk having God take back what He has given. That could have disastrous consequences.

Related Posts: Election: God’s Choice; The Hidden Things; Calvinist or Arminian

Moving Mountains

In his popular work, Walden, Henry David Thoreau said, “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.” I know he was not a Christian, but he was a keen observer of the human condition. Sadly, what he said about people in general can also be said of many who claim to be followers of Jesus Christ. The desperation Christians feel may be of a different sort than others, but it has the same consequence: turbidity. By that I mean that they seem to be confused or muddled in their thinking and acting. Jesus said that He came to bring abundant life to His disciples, yet too many of them appear to have refused or misplaced that gift.

One might ask what the abundant life should look like. Because Jesus has offered this gift to believers, it would help to know what it means to believe. In the Greek language of the New Testament, there is one word that is translated both belief and faith. In English, we need two words because we don’t have a decent verb form of the word faith. We don’t talk about “faithing” something, but we can believe something. Hence, we believe in Jesus or put our faith in Jesus, and we live a life of faith, or we live as believers.

So, the question becomes what faith/belief is. The tenth through the twelfth chapters of Hebrews are a good place to look for a lesson on faith. In the midst of that lesson there is a stunning statement: “Without faith it is impossible to please God.” At the very least we know that means to place faith in the atoning sacrifice of Christ on our behalf. That is the ringing gong of the Hebrews message: remain faithful to Christ, and don’t turn back to the now empty faith of Judaism. The Cross of Christ brought an end to the temple worship of the Jews, yet some of them were turning back to it. The Hebrew writer was admonishing them to remain faithful to the new order initiated by Christ.

But it is not just being faithful to Christ that the Hebrew writer emphasizes. The examples of faith he gives in chapters eleven and twelve delve into the depths of what it means to live by faith. The exemplars of faith – Noah, Abraham, Moses, et al. – each made critical life decisions grounded in their belief/faith in God. Their lives – and often their deaths – proved their faith was genuine. The Apostle Paul said as much in his lesson on faith in the book of Romans. We are all justified before God by the kind of faith demonstrated by Abraham.

So, to live by faith means to believe God – to believe His Word. But saving faith goes beyond even that; it must show up in the actions of the believer. James says faith without works is dead. Some have tried to say that contradicts Paul’s assertion that we are saved by faith, not by works. But in the sentence after that well-known phrase Paul ties works to saving faith saying that we were “created for good works.” Jesus was striking the same chord when He said that true faith would be revealed by the fruit it produced. The right kind of fruit is that which accomplishes the will of the Father – sharing the gospel, seeking justice, caring for the needy, supporting the work of the kingdom of God. That is the thrust of Jesus’ model prayer that God’s will be done on earth as it is in Heaven.

There is another important way to live by faith: to pray in faith believing that our prayers will be answered. Jesus made the startling claim that if His disciples prayed that way, the results were guaranteed. That assertion needs to be explained though. The Greek in Mark 11:24 literally says, “all things you pray and ask believe you [already] have, and they will come to be.” (πάντα ὅσα προσεύχεσθε καὶ αἰτεῖσθε, πιστεύετε ὅτι ἐλάβετε, καὶ ἔσται ὑμῖν.) Some Christians have tried to make that a sort of magic formula like rubbing the genie’s bottle and getting the answer they want. Nothing could be farther from the truth Jesus taught. He said if you have the assurance by faith that your request has already been granted, it will come to pass. That kind of faith can only be supported by the knowledge that the thing prayed for is completely within God’s will. If you know God has willed something to be, your true prayer is, “Thy will be done.” Which, by the way, goes back to Jesus’ model prayer again.

A.W. Tozer commented on the prayer of faith: “But the man of faith can go alone into the wilderness and get on his knees and command heaven—God is in that! The Christian who is willing to put himself in a place where he must get the answer from God and God alone—the Lord is in that! But there is no use trying to cover up the fact that there is a great deal of praying being done among us that does not amount to anything—it never brings anything back! It is like sending a farmer into the field without a plow. Little wonder that the work of God stands still!” ^[1]

Graham Cooke wrote in Crafted Prayers that we often fail in prayer because we immediately ask for our desires for the situation: heal this disease, fill this need, save this marriage. When those things aren’t forthcoming, we ask why God didn’t do what we want. The problem, Cooke says, is that we didn’t first seek to know what God wanted. There are two ways to learn what that is: pray for God to reveal His will in the situation and look to Scripture for the answer. When we know what God wants, we can pray in faith. When we fall short of that, our prayers fall short of heaven.

One time when the disciples failed to drive out a demon, they asked Jesus why they were unsuccessful. He said, “Because of your little faith… For truly I tell you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you will tell this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.” If your prayers aren’t moving mountains, examine your faith.

---

^[1] A. W. Tozer and Gerald B. Smith, Evenings with Tozer: Daily Devotional Readings (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 2015), 304.

Built Upon Sand

Jesus’ story of two builders is well known. One built on the solid rock and the other built on sand. When the storm came, the house on the rock stood, but the house on the sand collapsed. There are several interesting ways we can apply the lesson of this story.

The cliché, the sands of time, is meant to picture time like sand flowing through an hourglass. Those who deny God’s singular role in creation have attempted to convince us that over time, a very, very long time, all the complexities of our universe came into being by chance occurrence. All true scientists who have no philosophical axe to grind now realize that explanation of the origin of all things is impossible. They have discovered that the things we see are so incredibly complex and interwoven that no amount of time and chance can explain them. The evolution house built on the sands of time has collapsed.

The Jewish religious leaders in Jesus’ day had built their hopes for Messiah on the sand of their traditions. Jesus told them they searched the Scriptures but missed Him. He said they valued their traditions above the Word. The same kind of thing happens today. Some people tend to hang on every word some popular preacher speaks while never checking to see if the message agrees with what the Bible teaches. The Bereans were commended because even though they heard from an Apostle, they went home and searched the Scriptures, the rock of truth, to see if he was telling them the truth or throwing sand.

We might be prone to build sandcastles when it comes to our understanding of the Bible. A deep study of the Word can pay rich rewards. For example, there is a curious incident recorded in three of the Gospels about a woman with a chronic ailment who thought if she touched Jesus’ robe, she would be healed. Matthew records the incident: “Just then, a woman who had suffered from bleeding for twelve years approached from behind and touched the end of his robe, for she said to herself, ‘If I can just touch his robe, I’ll be made well.’ Jesus turned and saw her. ‘Have courage, daughter,’ he said. ‘Your faith has saved you.’ And the woman was made well from that moment.”

 We moderns wonder where such a ridiculous idea came from. Because historical context is an essential part of the bedrock of proper biblical interpretation, it must always be considered. In this case, a deeper knowledge of Jewish thought in the first century reveals that devout Jews believed that the holy things of God could literally transmit God’s holiness to others by touching them. This was one of the reasons for the strict regulations regarding temple fixtures and utensils. Noone but the priests were allowed to touch them, and the priests were not allowed to take them from the temple.

Consider what happened to Uzzah when David was taking the ark of the covenant back to Israel. Uzzah touched the holy ark and was instantly stuck dead by God. God had told Moses to make provisions for carrying the ark, and Uzzah violated them. It is obvious that much of the record we have concerning God’s dealing with Israel is meant to stress His holiness – His separateness from His creation. If we build our theology on a foundation made weak by lack of biblical knowledge, our house is bound to collapse at some point. As Uzzah learned, you don’t want to mess with a holy God.

Another example of houses built on sand is friendships built on other than heart-to-heart ties. Paul warns believers not to be unequally yoked with unbelievers. Here is A.W. Tozer on the subject: “Even though radically different from each other, two persons may enjoy the closest friendship for a lifetime; for it is not a requisite of friendship that the participants be alike in all things; it is enough that they be alike at the points where their personalities touch. Harmony is likeness at points of contact, and friendship is likeness where hearts merge. [Italics mine]

“For this reason, the whole idea of the divine-human friendship is logical enough and entirely credible. The infinite God and the finite man can merge their personalities in the tenderest, most satisfying friendship. In such relationship there is no idea of equality; only of likeness where the heart of man meets the heart of God! This likeness is possible because God at the first made man in His own image and is now remaking men in the image that was lost by sin.”

As Tozer points out, it is not just our human friendships that cry out for heart connections; our relationship with God must be essentially heart-to-heart. Throughout the Old Testament and often in the New, the heart is referred to as the deepest part of our human self.  The Apostle Paul expands our understanding of who we are by explaining that the Spirit of God speaks to our human spirit after it has been reborn or made alive. Heart-to-heart becomes spirit-to-Spirit for Paul. He constantly admonishes believers to walk in, be led by, pray in, sing in the spirit [or Spirit]. Jesus supports this reality telling the Samaritan woman that God desires those who will worship Him “in spirit and in truth.”

When Jesus told the parable of the two builders, His context was centered on hearing His word. He said, “Everyone who hears these words of mine and does them [italics mine] will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock.” As James said later, it is the doing, not the hearing only that builds on the right foundation. Paul cautions us that everything pertaining to this world is temporary and will one day be destroyed, whereas things of the spirit – built on the Rock – remain forever. Check your life to see what it is built on.

Related posts: Read This Or Die; Light Shining in Darkness; Through the Bible in Seven Minutes; The Presence of God

Has Your Messiah Come?

The record of the Old Testament flows consistently from the Garden to the Cross. The words of God to the fallen Adam and Eve promised One who would crush the serpent’s head, the serpent who had tempted them to sin, the serpent who would continually tempt God’s people. Knowing what was coming, the serpent, later identified as the devil himself, went to work distorting God’s word as he had in the Garden. From Cain to Caiaphas, God’s sworn enemy set out to darken people’s understanding of who Messiah would be so that they would not recognize Him when He came.

The Gospel of John proves that this undermining tactic worked. John says in the opening of his gospel: “He came to His own [things], but His own [people] did not receive Him.” How could the very people to whom Messiah came after years of expectant waiting and hundreds of prophecies miss the One when He came? The explanation is found in Paul’s words to the Ephesians. He said people were: “Darkened in understanding, alienated from the life of God, because of the ignorance that is in them, because of the hardness of their heart.” God’s enemy, the enemy of our souls, had done his job masterfully; the ones who should have known Him best missed His coming because they had been deceived just like their first parents had.

The Herodians and the Sadducees cherry-picked the Scriptures to find a military leader who would put Israel back on the political map. The Pharisees read the prophets differently; they longed for the ultimate law giver – the prophet like Moses who would congratulate them for their artificial obedience. The Zealots elevated anyone who would raise a sword against Rome as their Messiah. Of course, there were a few Jews who studied the Scriptures and waited patiently for God to reveal His Messiah to them. Among these were John’s parents, Mary (of course), Simeon, and Anna who are named in Luke’s Gospel.

Doubtless there were others as evidenced by the willingness of some to drop everything and follow Jesus when He began preaching the Kingdom of Heaven come. However, even these misunderstood what the Messiah had come to do. Judas Iscariot, who may have had Zealot sympathies, perhaps hoped to goad Jesus into action by bringing an armed group to arrest Him. James and John, the Sons of Thunder, wanted Jesus to exact immediate justice on an unbelieving town. Even after His sacrificial death and miraculous resurrection, His closest followers asked Him if He was now going to institute the Kingdom He had been preaching about. Jesus might have replied that He had already, that they misunderstood Him, but He simply told them to wait.

It is not hard to understand why people steeped in Old Testament prophecy would expect a conquering Messiah riding a war horse and wielding the sword of the Lord. There are pictures like that scattered throughout the scrolls of ancient Scripture. There are also images of a lawgiver who would reign in righteousness. Likewise, there are pictures of a Suffering Servant who appears to endure disgraceful treatment. This last picture was ignored in favor of the more exciting, more encouraging one of the conquering hero. What those ancients missed was the fact that both pictures were accurate; they didn’t see that they were separated by a period of time yet to be measured. It is as if they raised their prophetic telescope above the nearer image to focus on the farther one.

There are Christians today who may be suffering from a similar mistaken focus. They see the Suffering Messiah who bore their sin, but they raise the prophetic telescope above what happened within a generation after His resurrection. They may be placing too much emphasis on their own personal escape from judgment and ignoring the judgment God brought on His people Israel. The consistent warning to Israel throughout the prophets was that God would execute judgment against them if they persisted in their disobedience. This judgment was to be followed by the institution of God’s kingdom ruled by His righteous Servant. Few people will argue that what the Romans did in 70 A.D. was not God’s judgment. As He had in the past, God used a secular government to accomplish His will for His people.

The visions of Daniel clearly portray the tromping of Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome through the future of the “beautiful land.” The prophets never pulled any punches when describing what the invading nations would do to Israel. Although the apocalyptic language is poetic with mountains tumbling and stars falling, it names the players and starts the game clock which runs right up until Rome makes God’s final statement against apostasy: the final destruction of His physical temple on earth. Those with improperly aimed prophetic telescopes scan right past this obvious culmination of biblical history and look for a messianic coming that is already past.

Does any of this matter? It certainly mattered to the Jews who crucified their Messiah. It mattered to scores of people in the past who declared that Jesus had returned when, apparently, He hadn’t. It matters to believers today who treat Christ’s saving grace as if it was their personal ticket to a future millennial kingdom without considering their responsibilities in the already-not-yet Kingdom of Heaven Jesus announced. It has been said some people are so heavenly minded that they are no earthly good. I would say some people are so millennial kingdom minded they are no good in the present kingdom.

It is no surprise that the vast majority of people who are waiting for a millennial kingdom are Americans. The spirit of rugged individualism and a sense entitlement are so ingrained in our thinking that we imagine God’s cosmic plan is focused on us. In our pampered state, it is easy to forget that the majority of people outside our borders live in extreme poverty. Remember Jesus’ words about the difficulty the rich face entering the Kingdom of Heaven. Remember that it is the poor who inherit the earth. We may miss the real meaning of Messiah’s message that resonates so clearly with the rest of the world. If your Messiah has come, and His kingdom is now-not-later, you should be begging to know what service your King requires. Here! Now!

Related posts: It’s Not All About You; Bringing the Kingdom; Why Heaven Matters; Binding Satan

Reaping the Whirlwind

I wrote in “Today’s Chaldean Chastisement” that I thought it possible that God was using Iran (modern-day Chaldeans) to punish America for her sins. Later, in “Who are the Other Gods” I explained that God has been dealing with other nations besides Israel since the beginning. Because of God’s obvious global interest, I can’t help but wonder how America plays in the grand scheme of things. I know that God’s chosen people are no longer a national entity; they are a spiritual congregation from all nations. Yet what would God think of a nation so clearly founded on His biblical principles going the way of ancient Israel?

These passages from Hosea struck me as particularly pertinent:

Indeed, they sow the wind

and reap the whirlwind. (8:7)

 

The days of punishment have come;

the days of retribution have come.

Let [God’s people] recognize it!

The prophet is a fool,

and the inspired man is insane,

because of the magnitude

of your iniquity and hostility. (9:7)

 

You have plowed wickedness and reaped injustice;

you have eaten the fruit of lies

Because you have trusted in your own way. (10:13)

 

But you must return to your God.

Maintain love and justice,

and always put your hope in God. (12:6)

 

The book of Hosea closes with these words:

 

Let whoever is wise understand these things,

and whoever is insightful recognize them.

For the ways of the Lord are right,

and the righteous walk in them,

but the rebellious stumble in them. (14:9)

 

I am not suggesting that the judgment God brought on the nations in Old Testament times is directly applicable to America. However, we hear the Lord say, “I am Yahweh; I do not change.” In the fourth chapter of Amos, God lists all the disasters He brought on Israel; He ends each with the line: “Yet you did not return to me.” The implication is obvious yet chilling. God wreaked havoc to cause Israel to repent. The prophets assure God’s unrepentant people that He will show mercy if they return to Him. They did not. They paid the price He promised.

 

R.C. Sproul writes in The Holiness of God: “Far from being a history of a harsh God, the Old Testament is the record of a God who is patient in the extreme. The Old Testament is the history of a persistently hard-necked people who rebel time after time against God. The people became slaves in a foreign land. They cried out to God. God heard their groans and moved to redeem them. He parted the Red Sea to let them out of bondage. They responded by worshiping a gold cow.”

Summing up God’s plans for the infant nation of Israel, Moses warned: “After the Lord your God has driven [the nations] out before you, do not say to yourself, ‘The Lord has brought me here to take possession of this land because of my righteousness.’ No, it is on account of the wickedness of these nations that the Lord is going to drive them out before you. It is not because of your righteousness or your integrity that you are going in to take possession of their land.”

Commenting on this passage Sproul writes: “God reminds Israel that it is not because of their righteousness that He will defeat the Canaanites. He wanted to make that point clear. Israel might have been tempted to jump to the conclusion that God was ‘on their side’ because they were better than pagan nations. God’s announcement made that inference impossible. Since it is our tendency to take grace for granted, my guess is that God found it necessary from time to time to remind Israel that grace must never be assumed. On rare but dramatic occasions He showed the dreadful power of His justice. He killed Nadab and Abihu. He killed Uzzah. He commanded the slaughter of the Canaanites. It is like He was saying, ‘Be careful. While you enjoy the benefits of my grace, don’t forget my justice. Don’t forget the gravity of sin. Remember that I am holy.’”

It is not unusual to hear someone suggest that God has blessed America uniquely because of her initial founding on biblical principles. Like Sproul says of ancient Israel, we too might imagine God is “on our side” because of a special relationship. I don’t pretend to know what God’s mind is toward America. I do know without doubt what His mind is toward evil, and America is descending further and further into a dark abyss of immorality. I am certain the principle of reaping what you sow is universal. I would not be surprised to learn that God applies it to nations as well as individuals.

Someone might be tempted to say that all this “Bible stuff” is irrelevant to the present world situation. I disagree. C. S. Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity, “[those] who did the most for the present world were precisely those who thought most of the next.” Thinking of the next world (the new earth where righteousness dwells), setting our minds on things above (where Christ sits enthroned above the nations), praying that God’s will be done on earth as it is in Heaven – these are the actions that are most needful. We are ambassadors from another kingdom, the Kingdom of the Holy God; let’s be about the King’s business.

Related posts: Bringing the Kingdom; Today’s Chaldean Chastisement; Who Are the Other Gods?; Light Shining in Darkness; Read This or Die