Disagree Agreeably

I have been asking myself lately if it is wrong to disagree with a fellow-believer. The rancor of the 2020 presidential election reached a level that I have not seen in my lifetime. The opposing views, conservative versus progressive, pitted many believers against one another. If you are a regular reader, you know that I am firmly in the conservative camp, and I have written forcefully against the idea of Christians voting for the progressive agenda. (See “How Could a Christian Vote for Hillary”) This has put me on the naughty list of several people whom I hold dear.

I don’t see how disagreement in and of itself can be wrong. The Bible does clearly call for unity, but unity is not uniformity. Because of our varied, God-given dispositions, and due to the variety of gifts granted by the Holy Spirit, uniformity is not possible. Paul makes this point when describing the function of the body of Christ in 1 Corinthians 12. We are not all the same, nor should we wish to be.

God had a purpose in making us each unique; the blending of our differences creates the fully functioning body of Christ which is God’s plan for this age. Using the traditional character types as an example, it is easy to see how each might react differently to the same situation. The choleric will want to fight; the sanguine will get everybody talking; the melancholy will worry; the phlegmatic will go with the flow. Put these four in a room to discuss politics and add their individual spiritual gifts to the mix, and you can imagine there will be some disagreement.

Because each of us come at any situation from our own unique combination of natural and spiritual proclivities, some disagreement about how to approach a situation is natural – even healthy. The question then becomes what is the essence of healthy disagreement? The first rule in all relationships is obviously to love the other even if we disagree. Biblical loving is caring about the other person more than for myself. This may mean backing down or giving deference to the other. (Phil. 2:3-4) If the consequences of an issue about which we disagree with another believer puts them or another person in physical, moral or spiritual danger, we have a duty to warn them of the negative consequences of their position. Scripture instructs us to do so (Matt. 18:15-20). This is also the compassionate thing to do as well as the loving thing. (For more on biblical compassion, see “More Than a Feeling”)

This becomes particularly difficult when our compassionate correction is perceived as a combative attack. As in every situation, we look to Jesus for our example of righteous behavior. While it is true as Isaiah 42:3 said, “He will not break a broken reed, and he will not extinguish a dim wick,” His meekness does not keep Messiah from, “bring[ing] justice forth in faithfulness." We have only to look at Jesus’ reaction to the harmful policies of the Pharisees to see strong feelings and strong words emerge from His meek character. Our Lord’s disagreement with the religious leaders of His day angered them to the point of seeking His death.

I see a parallel in the present day. If I express a biblical view of certain things, I will encounter strong disagreement from those with different opinions. These disagreements are not limited to non-believers only. If I denounce homosexuality based on Deuteronomy and Romans, I am branded as a homophobe even by some who call themselves Christians. If I decry the murderous policies of unrestricted abortion, I am called a misogynist. If I say it is not the government’s job to provide welfare for non-citizens, I am a labeled xenophobe. Each of these positions has sound biblical backing, and my disagreement with my fellow-believers flows from the Scriptural directive to teach, reprove, correct and train in righteousness. (2 Tim. 3:16)

The Apostle Paul had disagreements with people inside and outside of the church. His two letters to the Corinthian church are primarily corrective of misunderstandings and misinterpretations of his teaching. Paul’s teachings now represent a large portion of our New Testament, having been written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. This fact brings up a critical question regarding differences that stem from Scriptural interpretation. I once had a discussion with a young lady about the biblical position against homosexuality. Her more open-minded position contrasted with my biblical accusation of the behavior as sin. The discussion ended with her declaration that my position was just “my interpretation.”

And she was right. It just happens that “my interpretation” was correct. (See “The Importance of Being Right”) Because we must follow accepted hermeneutical standards and use logical principles of literary understanding, it is possible to claim that one’s interpretation of a Scriptural principle is correct. (See “Answering Rob Bell”) When that interpretation places one believer in disagreement with another believer, sparks often fly. The correct way to deal with the situation would be to have a cool-headed discussion of the salient interpretive principles. Because truth is absolute, and because logic demands that contradictory “truths” cannot co-exist, one person in the disagreement must admit to being mistaken. The result may be a “beam and mote” controversy with each believing the other is wrong.

As a last option, agreeing to disagree, while not ideal, can be the best outcome. I have seen relationships endure for many years with the understanding that certain topics are off limits because of a disagreement. As I mentioned earlier, if there is grave danger in one of the positions, and if dire consequences may result from holding that position, and yet the warning is not heeded, it is painful to stand by and watch the train wreck. In the aftermath, it is difficult not to say, “I told you so.” The best one can hope is that the negative consequences will bring about a change of mind in the one who suffers, assuming the consequences were not deadly.

Sometimes loving someone means having to watch them make serious mistakes brought about by unheeded correction. The collateral damage of “tough love” reaches both the loved and the lover. Jesus wept when He looked upon Jerusalem and the people who were about to turn against Him and call for His execution. Our Savior submitted to God’s will and bore the consequences, “for the joy that was set before Him.” (Hebrews 12:1-3)

Every disagreement will not be resolved in this life. An agreeable disagreement may be painful. We take consolation in the fact that the lives of both parties to a dispute are in the same Heavenly Hands. There may be no resolution to some disagreements, but as Paul told the Philippians (1:27-30), while believers may have their differences, eventually there will be unity when we all stand before the Lord.

Related Posts: “What’s Wrong with Politics in America”; “Beware of Bowlegged Politicians”; “The Uncorrupted Life”

God Was Pleased

There are some statements in the Bible that are not just difficult to understand but also hard to believe. That is to say that they are hard to believe if your beliefs about who God is don’t square with the Person the Bible reveals as God. One of those statements struck me this morning as my devotional reading led me to consider the meaning and purpose of the Sabbath. Stick with me and I will try to retrace my thoughts.

Once when the Pharisees challenged Jesus for plucking grain on the Sabbath, an act that was forbidden by their law, Jesus made a somewhat enigmatic claim: ““The Sabbath was established for [man], and not [man] for the Sabbath. So then, the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.” (Mark 2:27-28) The messianic title, Son of Man, usually draws attention to some aspect of the humanity of Jesus. In this case, Jesus as Lord claims lordship over a human benefit ordained by God in creation: sabbath. Just as God “rested” upon completion of His work in creation, His people were told to take a break from their required labors. Work is not a result of the curse; caring for the Garden was explicitly assigned to God’s people before they rebelled. That work became more tiresome after the fall, but the work and the rest from work are part of God’s original design.

I notice that God was pleased with His original plan; the Genesis record of creation emphasizes that God said it was good. Work and the rest it necessitated were part of the good creation. The fall into sin affected every relationship encountered by God’s people, including their relationship to work and rest. When God set about to rectify the damage done by the fall, He devised a plan to send His Son to earth to work on His behalf. Being the perfect man, the Son was assigned the perfecting work. The most unpleasant part of that work took place on the hill called Calvary.

Here is the shocking revelation about God: He was pleased to offer His only Son at Calvary. We must not imagine a sort of sadistic pleasure; rather, God was pleased to know that through the suffering of His Son, all relationships would be made right again. Isaiah puts it this way: “Yet Yahweh was pleased to crush him…. From the trouble of his life he will see; he will be satisfied. In his knowledge, the righteous one, my servant, shall declare many righteous, and he is the one who will bear their iniquities. (Isaiah 53:10–11). The mess made in the Garden by the first Adam would be corrected by the second Adam.

This sometimes puts believers living in between the first and second coming of the Son of Man in an awkward place. Because we need food, clothing and shelter, we must work to provide those necessities. Human society has become very complex, so most of us don’t tend our own garden to provide our physical needs. In theory, each of us labors as a tiny cog in a giant machine that results in our physical needs being met. It is this labor that necessitates a sabbath rest. One day in seven we take a break to recharge our batteries, and I don’t believe it matters what day of the week we rest, just so we rest. The Fourth Commandment reminds us that our rest day has a purpose: in it we remember our Creator.

But that is not all. We are also required to continue the work Jesus started by bringing the good news of God’s redemptive plan to all people. Paradoxically, our sabbath rest serves as part of our work to bring the good news. Our paychecks would be 14% larger if we skipped the seventh-day break. Those who get overtime pay would benefit even more. But the commandment requires us to honor God with rest one day in seven. If we make this obvious to non-believers, we are declaring God’s rule over our lives; we declare God’s Kingdom come in our lives. (For more reasons to go to church see “Why Bother With Church?)

Everybody knows John 3:16, even many non-believers. What struck me in all this today is how fully “God so loved the world.” As the famous verse says, He sent His Son. But there is more. The world God created is not only the Perfect Planet  for human existence, it abounds with pleasures and beauty. God didn’t have to make pretty flowers or gorgeous sunsets or majestic mountains or tasty food or marital love, but He did. Paul says God “provides us all things richly for enjoyment.” That includes work and rest. It pleased Him to use Calvary to do that. Remember that the next time you take your sabbath rest.

Related posts: “What is the Church?”

Why Wait?

From Sunday school to Bible college through two seminary degrees I seem to recall being told that salvation is a process. It has a beginning point; the exact point is debated whether it’s at confession or baptism, but either will do for my point here. Suffice it to say humans are born lost and must be born again to be saved. I have been taught that salvation begins with justification, carries on through sanctification, and ends with glorification. That seems logical, and it can apparently be supported as biblical. (For another look at this idea, see “Lies We Have Been Told”)

There may be a problem with thinking of salvation as a process, however. Looking at each aspect of salvation individually, it is possible to assert that the process explanation is a crutch – a concession to our humanity that disregards the truly spiritual nature of salvation. When Jesus explained to Nicodemus how salvation was accomplished in John chapter 3, He described it as a purely spiritual operation. Jesus said one must be born “of water” and “of spirit.” Most scholars agree that “of water” refers to the physical reality of human beginnings in the amniotic waters of the womb; some argue that it refers to baptism, but either way, it is a physical, material condition.

The second birth Jesus mentioned, the “from above” birth is of the spirit. Jesus and the New Testament authors consistently use “from above” to refer to the spiritual plane. Like us, they thought of heaven as being above where the other, spiritual dimension existed. To be born again, as it is sometimes translated, is to be born of spirit. Paul’s teaching throughout his letters speaks often of believers having been once dead but now being alive. The death that was overcome in the act of salvation is a spiritual death, and the new life that results is a spiritual life. Read Paul again: life “in the spirit” is the sine qua non of saving faith. In the opposite state, in the flesh, it is impossible to please God (Romans 8:1-8)

The space-time continuum as Einstein discovered it was created by God for the benefit of His time-bound, temporal creatures. The Bible is quite clear about this when it says things like, “[God] chose us in [Christ] before the foundation of the world.” (Eph. 1:4) There is a sense in which those who are born again are justified, sanctified and glorified before they are even born the first time. We spend our earthly existence bound by the restrictions of physical time while at the same “time” we are new creations living in spiritual “time.”

This condition is fairly easy to imagine with regard to justification because it is a one-time declaration of one’s righteousness, but it is more difficult to see how it works with sanctification and glorification. A deeper look into the meaning of each of those words may help clear it up. The New Testament word “sanctification” comes from the same Greek word often translated “holy.” To be holy means to be set apart for a particular purpose. That purpose is anchored in spiritual “time” in Romans 8:28-30 where all the verbs are in aorist tense, meaning they are actions completed in the past. Our purpose, the passage says, is to be conformed into the image of Christ.

The New Testament teaches that the way we are supposed to accomplish our conformation is to live, pray, sing and be filled in spirit (or with the Spirit). We are aided in our specific duties by the spiritual gifts each believer receives; we are sanctified, made holy, when we use the gifts we are given for the purpose God intends. This conforms us individually to the image of Christ, and it corporately forms His body, the Church into the spotless bride for whom He will one day return. Our “setting apart,” our sanctification is a done deal; we have only to get with the program and live like we know it.

Not surprisingly, this brings about our glorification as well. Again, the Greek word “glory” means, on one level, to look good. We glorify God when we make Him look good or reveal His goodness. Just as an earthly father looks like a wise, good parent when his children behave appropriately, our Heavenly Father “looks good” when His adopted children fulfill their spiritual purpose. By living “in the spirit” as we are commanded, we bring glory to God and as a result, we too are glorified.

If all this has become too academic, let me try to put it in practical terms. If we are sitting around on our justified bottoms waiting for our sanctification to become fully realized so that one day we can be glorified and complete the salvation process, we are missing the point. Every time we move in accordance with the promptings of the Holy Spirit, every time we commit an act that is empowered by our unique spiritual gift, every time we reveal the nine-fold fruit of the Spirit in our lives we demonstrate the reality of our salvation. Every believer has the potential to complete his or her salvation whenever the Spirit is allowed to take control.

Not sure if you have fully trusted Christ for your justification? Do it now. Don’t know what your unique spiritual gift is? Begin praying that God will reveal it to you and ask your fellow believers to help you. If you want to bring glory to God, you have the potential to do so this very minute. Now is the time; why wait?

Loving Biblically

You have probably seen the bumper sticker, “Love is a Verb.” It is correct, of course, but love is also a noun. The important thing to know is that biblical love, the noun, is always expressed in action; love really is a verb. The modern definitions of love cannot be confused with the biblical truth. Love in the biblical sense cannot mean affection or lust as Hollywood portrays. Nor can love be mere acceptance without judgment as the moderns would have us believe (eg. Rob Bell). Although biblical love is not purely an emotion, it has an emotional component. (See “More Than a Feeling”) The question then becomes what actions appropriately express biblical love.

The prayer of Paul in Philippians 1:9-10 gives a clue to what real, biblical love must look like. “And this I pray: that your love may abound still more and more in knowledge and all discernment, so that you may approve what is superior, in order that you may be sincere and blameless in the day of Christ.” Paul did not simply pray that the Philippians would love more; he asked that they might love better, “in knowledge and discernment.” We need to know who to love and how to love.

This is not just some academic exercise of interest only to scholars. Jesus plainly said that love would be the distinguishing attribute of His disciples (John 13:35). While that statement was about love among His followers, His other great commandment about love broadens the field: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” He even went so far as to say we must love our enemies. That pretty well covers the whole human race. And it applies to everyone who claims the name of Christ. That covers the “who.”

The “how” is more difficult to summarize. One answer is to understand the first century meaning of the verb the New Testament uses for love: agapao (ἀγαπάω). As many have said, this is not a love primarily of the emotions but of the will. However, I have come to realize late in my life that it is not devoid of emotion if fully engaged. (See “More Than a Feeling”) The love that we are to imitate is the love of God, and that contains an element of compassion as demonstrated time and again throughout the Old and New Testaments. We have only to witness Yahweh pining over wayward Israel or Jesus weeping over Jerusalem to see the emotional aspect of divine love.

We are not left clueless as to what loving actions look like. In what perhaps is Jesus’ most well-known parable, he describes love in action by telling the story of the “good Samaritan.” In the story, a man takes care of another’s immediate physical needs and goes a step further to provide for his short-term security. We aren’t told if the Samaritan had feelings for the injured man; what we do know is that he made an effort to care for him. The word “care” is my favorite synonym for “love” in the Bible. Biblical love means to care about someone, to care for them, to care for them as you would care for yourself.

Here is where love gets tricky. If I love someone who is abusing drugs, it may seem that meeting their immediate need would mean providing them with drugs. This is patently ridiculous. The best thing I can do is help them get clean; this is their true need, not another fix. Sometimes, love must be tough. This also applies to what we tell people. If someone is contemplating an action that is contrary to God’s will, we are bound to tell them that the Bible condemns their actions (Galatians 6:1-4).

I am inching out on a limb now, but I think that in a representative government like we have in America, our love for our fellow-citizens compels us to support causes that will foster an atmosphere that is conducive to biblical principles. At the risk of beating a dead horse, I believe abortion falls into this category. Many Americans want a mother to have the right to terminate a pregnancy at will. Terminating a pregnancy is taking a human life according to the teaching of Scripture.

Taking a human life is something that can be done properly only under the most dire circumstances. Defending one’s life or the life of another can be accepted; just wars fall into this category. Capital punishment has long been thought to be another instance of the proper taking of a life, but this concept is reasonably debated. Taking a human life because it would be inconvenient for another person is clearly not acceptable by biblical standards. Pressing for public policy that severely limits access to abortion is a way to show love for all those who may be contemplating a dreadful mistake.

This is nothing like the “theocracy” that Christian opponents claim it is. If a majority of voters want policies that support biblical principles, they have every right to see them enacted. Furthermore, it is not hateful to seek such policies. In the public square today, the word hate has devolved into a code word for disagreement. If you disagree with abortion on demand, you hate women. If you disagree with the LGBTQ agenda, you hate gays. If you support limiting immigration in any way, you hate foreigners. It is not hateful to disagree with someone on public policy matters, but that is where we have come in today’s public discourse.

My final point has me quite a way out on the limb I mentioned, but I believe I am still attached to the trunk of truth. Campaigning for policies that support biblical principles is not hateful; in fact, it is the most loving thing we can do. I believe that people everywhere in the world would be best served, best cared for by regimes that followed biblical principles. Keeping America on the track of her founding, biblical principles is the loving thing to do. Speaking against those who disagree is not hateful; it is instructive in its intent and loving in its motivation.

The same thing goes for foreign policy. For example, calling out the Chinese for their role in the corona virus pandemic is not hateful; it does not mean I hate the Chinese. It means I love my fellow-citizens enough to want them to stand against a serious threat to our country. Supporting policies that limit immigration does not make me a xenophobe; it means I love my fellow-citizens enough to want them protected against the ravages of uncontrolled immigration. I love the people who are in distress and want to come to America, but biblically speaking, it is not the job of government to care for them; that is the Christians’ job; it is the responsibility of the church to meet their needs.

I am back to Paul’s words to the Philippians. Christian, biblical love must abound in knowledge and discernment if we aim to be sincere and blameless. To know how God loves, we have to dig deeply into the Bible and ferret out the true measure of divine love; it is a mix of caring, compassion and judgment. The most difficult thing to grasp is that God’s love involves discernment – judgment. Yes, God so loved the world that He sent His Son that believers should not perish but spend eternity with Him. Notice: the unbelievers perish. Jesus said, “If you love me, keep my commandments.” It would be cruel, unloving for Jesus to demand obedience and then grant eternal life to all without discerning between the obedient and the disobedient.

I have put myself in a tough place. If I am obedient to Christ and love in a biblical way, I will offend some people. Some people will think I am a hater; they may hate me for what I say and do. At the risk of sounding arrogant, I will recount the words of Jesus: “They hated me; they will hate you too.” I am not happy about this situation. Another passage of Scripture comes to mind: “Whether it is better to obey God or man, you decide.” I know where I stand. I know I am sincere; I trust I am blameless as well.

NOTE: If you can disprove my position with a biblical argument, please comment here. I must review all comments before they will appear on this page. I will not publish your comment unless you specifically permit me to do so.

2020 Election Fraud

A thoughtful, highly intelligent young friend of mine whom I have know since he was a student in my high school classroom thirty years ago has been debating the assertion that there was fraud in the 2020 presidential election. He invited me to review a Wikipedia article that details the situation surrounding over 50 cases of alleged fraud. Having reviewed the article, I am surprised my young friend suggested it; it does little to deny the possibility of fraud in the election. To be fair, what it does is show that there has been precious little adjudication one way or the other.

As the chart below indicates, as of this study only six cases had been ruled on, four cases had trials ongoing, and six cases had been appealed. In other words, forty-four cases remained undecided. This does not mean they are either right or wrong about election fraud; it means we don’t know whether there was fraud or not. The only way to know if the election results were tampered with will be to bring more of these cases under scrutiny.

Add to the court cases the uncertainty caused by several statistical anomalies, and you have a reason to want the investigations to continue. The anomalies are of two types: one shows highly improbable shifts in voter allegiance from Republican to Democrat in several blocks of voters; the second is reports of batches of mail or absentee ballots being almost entirely votes for Biden. Both of these situations logically demand a closer look. Even with the Trump hatred fomented by biased media, the likelihood that entire voting blocks would swing from a large Republican majority to a similar ratio favoring Democrats is questionable. Finding large batches of Biden-only votes late on election night is also highly suspicious, particularly when Republican poll-watchers were kept from observing in some cases.

The bottom line is that the election reeks of potential fraud. Sadly, the justice system that should be the check to balance Democrat shenanigans has either sold out to the Dems, or it has moved too slowly to raise the fraud issue before the election was certified. County election officials and even judges are not above acting on their personal bias rather than remaining neutral. One has only to remember the decisions of the Ninth Circuit Court in recent years to see that bias is alive and well in the judicial system. The split decisions of the Supreme Court fall almost entirely along political lines proving that the courts do not remain immune to the forces of ideological whim.

I think it was very presidential of President Trump to concede the election to Biden in the face of such uncertainty. Given the slow turning of the wheels of justice, it appears unlikely that a complete picture of the election will emerge before January 20. Denouncing the radicals who stormed the Capitol during the certification was Trump being presidential. His promise to affect a smooth transition of power to the Biden apparatus was presidential. To have done otherwise would have thrown the country into a state of indecision and unrest that would be counterproductive.

I will be curious to see what happens to the allegations of fraud contained in the forty-four cases in the study that have not been investigated either judicially or otherwise. It will be an unprecedented situation if sufficient fraud is discovered after January 20 to change the results of the election in Trump’s favor. To my knowledge, the country has never faced such a challenge. I don’t think the Constitution has a clause covering election correction after a presidential inauguration.

I do know that the situation surrounding the 2020 presidential election has seriously undermined the confidence of a large slice of the electorate. The machinations of the Democrats to change the way we vote supposedly motivated by concerns related to the COVID 19 restrictions must be reviewed. God willing there won’t be a pandemic at the time of the next national election in 2022, and the extreme measures taken in 2020 can be eliminated. Every one of the changes the Democrats made to the voting process increases the potential for fraud. The most pressing priority in the next two years for any who care about election integrity must be to reinstate a voting process that is transparent and fair to all.

Total count of post-election lawsuits
State	Dropped	Dismissed	Appeal ongoing	Trial ongoing	Ruled	Total
Arizona	3	3	1	0	0	7
Georgia	1	3	2	1	0	7
Michigan	2	3	1	0	1	7
Nevada	2	5	0	0	0	7
Pennsylvania*	1	7	1	1	3	13
Wisconsin	1	4	1	0	1	7
Others	1	2	0	2	1	6
Totals	11	27	6	4	6	54

 

The Importance of Being Right

"As God’s people, we are given guidelines throughout Scripture for how to treat others, how to use our words, and how to control our thoughts. Yet we do not do this on our own. God’s Spirit now dwells in us—we are His temple (2 Cor 6:16). And He performs this work in us so that we may live as disciples at all times and in all places.” ¹ As Paul told the Philippians, “ For the one at work in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure [or purpose], is God.”

This devotional was drawn from Leviticus where we learn that God is holy and calls His people to be holy also. “Holy” means set apart for a purpose. We must learn our purpose in order to fulfill the demand to be holy. In my case, I am as certain as I can be that God’s purpose for me is to be a teacher. In my early twenties, during a time of deep searching I heard Him say this to me in as near an audible voice as I have ever experienced. Over the years since then, my calling has been confirmed both by God and His people.

In the longest of my several careers, I was employed as a teacher of English mostly, so I was fulfilling my call and gifting while earning a living. This is not the only possible way for me to be “holy,” however. The so-called Great Commission in Matthew’s Gospel is a record of Jesus’ command to His disciples to “make disciples… teaching them.” The core meaning of “disciple” is to be a learner; learning and teaching are two sides of the same coin. This is where Aubrey Smith’s observation comes in. We are called to be disciples, teachers at all times.

If I am to be a teacher, a disciple of Jesus worthy of the calling, I must be certain that what I am teaching is the truth. God forbid that I should present a lesson that contains anything false or misleading. After all, Jesus is the Truth, so if I am mirroring Him, representing Him, I must represent the truth to the best of my ability. For this reason, I study, I research, I prepare the lessons I plan to teach with greatest care. This certainly applies to my efforts to teach Bible lessons, but it applies equally to anything I attempt to share by way of educating an audience.

I have been publishing a blog for over ten years. Each one of the 300+ articles I have written represent at least two or three hours of research and collateral reading, sometimes more, often spread over more than one day. I take that amount of time because I want to assure myself that I am presenting the truth. Many of my articles express my opinions. Opinions are not the same as facts. Facts are discreet pieces of truth; truth is an absolute. For something to be true, it must be true for all people at all times in all situations.

While I believe the Bible is the final arbiter of knowable truth, there are many true things that are not explicitly stated in the Bible. The earth is round; the universe is expanding; nuclear fission produces heat. These are all true things not mentioned in the Scripture, and the list of such things is virtually endless. The same can be said of behaviors in general or specific actions. To judge the truth of such things, one must understand some basic principles of truth taught in Scripture and apply those principles to specific situations.

This is where opinion enters. Jeffrey Dahmer, Idi Amin and Adolf Hitler are not mentioned by name in the Bible. However, it is my opinion that their actions are wrong, bad, unbiblical; that is to say that their actions do not align with what the Bible identifies as true goodness. “The good,” as the Greeks sought it and the Bible reveals it, is an element of “the True.” When I apply what I consider to be the good and true as revealed in the Bible, I can form an opinion of the actions of people. While my opinion is not Scripture, if I have correctly applied Scripture, my opinion is valid.

This is true of all opinions. All opinions are by no means of equal validity. Opinions are based on facts aka truth. An opinion based on “facts” that are not true is not a valid opinion. Jesus said knowing the truth sets one free. Knowledge, then, is the key to intellectual as well as spiritual freedom. Knowledge of that which is true is what makes it possible to form a valid opinion. In my thinking, I want all my opinions to comport with the truth revealed in Scripture because it alone validates truth.

From beginning to end, the Bible explicitly and implicitly teaches that wisdom begins with knowledge. Full life, meaningful life, eternal life (zoe), Jesus said is found in knowing God. (John 17:3) God is best known by getting to know His revelation of Himself in Scripture, although He can also be understood through the things He has made. (Romans 1:20) This is why I search the Scriptures daily to learn all I can about God. This also explains my interest in everything from astrophysics to bioethics. God is revealed in both Scripture and nature.

I crave that revelation because I want to be right. As a teacher it is essential that I be right. This is why James said, “Be not many of you teachers.” This is why Aubrey Smith’s quote struck me when I read it. I must allow the Holy Spirit to continue His work in me so that I may, “live as [a disciple] at all times and in all places.” It may sound arrogant to say, but when I express an opinion, at that moment, in my state of knowledge at that moment, I believe I am right. I welcome all challenges to my positions as long as they are based on the same foundation as that on which I stand: revealed truth. If I am wrong, I want to be proved wrong so that I can correct my position. As a disciple of Jesus Christ, it is of utmost importance that I be right. If there is something wrong with that, prove it.

^[1] Smith, Aubrey. (2014). Redefining Sacred Space. In J. D. Barry & R. Van Noord (Eds.), Moment with God: A Devotional on Every Biblical Book. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.

America Held Captive

 Here’s a strange thought: maybe American Christians are being punished with a Biden presidency. I’m thinking along the same lines as when I wrote “Today’s Chaldean Chastisement.” Believers are about to be taken captive in their own land by the powers of darkness in the form of a government apparatus that will systematically remove the Judeo-Christian basis that has influenced policy since the country’s founding. I am not saying that America has ever been a Christian nation. I am not saying all Democrats are evil. I am not saying that there are no Christians who identify as Democrats. I am saying that the apparatus that will come to pass under a Biden administration will be decidedly un- or anti-Christian in many ways.

Some Democrat positions may be debatable by honest Christians; some clearly are not. For one, abortion at any stage of pregnancy takes a human life. An embryo that will eventually become a viable human being is nothing but human; killing it is taking human life. This is murder and is prohibited by Bible principles. Many in the Democrat party are only one vote away from approving infanticide; killing an unwanted child after birth is on their agenda. The neighbors of ancient Israel worshipped a god called Molech who demanded they offer their children on his altar as burnt sacrifices. The 21^st century god of the “Choice” movement is called Convenience, and the heinous nature of the act is the same.

Second, God created male and female humans as unique yet equal bearers of His image. He ordained family – “Be fruitful and multiply” – as the foundation of human society. Pretending that humans can choose what gender they wish to be is utter foolishness; simple biology teaches this. Worse, the resulting confusion of gender dysphoria damages individuals and ignoring gender roles destroys the meaning of “family.” Same sex unions cannot be considered marriage in the biblical sense because they do not create family in the biblical sense. A Biden administration will continue the spread of this unbiblical thinking and make it unpopular to think otherwise. Acting contrary to this thinking is already a criminal act in many situations.

Third, I once heard a riddle that asked how you could tell that a politician was lying; the answer was that his/her lips would be moving. Lying is not a Democrat behavior only; Republicans lie also. Both are human and therefore subject to human frailty. The problem with our current crop of Democrats is the pervasiveness and consequence of their lies. The Clinton era lies (Whitewater, Lewinsky, their Foundation’s activities, etc.) were bad, but they mostly benefitted themselves personally. Biden era lies cover up activity that will eventually destroy America if it continues. The big tech/China cabal Democrats are trying to hide is the most dangerous threat to our country since Soviet communism. Trusting the major media outlets to uncover these lies is a fool’s errand because the media have become complicit in the project to lie to the American people.

Fourth, a takeover by China would end the religious liberty this country has enjoyed. There is no religious liberty under any communist state; certainly, there is none in China. Communism as a philosophy seeks to eliminate all religion. Although a political coup is not condemned by Scripture, and some were divinely ordained, the call to do whatever is possible to increase the spread of the gospel is biblical. Stopping the spread of communism is a biblical endeavor, in my opinion. A Biden administration would return us to the Obama days of reduced military strength and capitulation to the enemies of Christianity.

There. I said it. If you are a Democrat supporter and still reading, I suspect you are fuming. The fact is, as a representative democracy, Americans get the type of government the majority of voters want. Unfortunately, between 35% and 40% of voters in America want the “free” stuff the Democrats pretend to offer. They vote Democrat because they think it will improve their lot in life. They do this in ignorance because they have believed a lie. The truth of what a communist/socialist government will provide is demonstrated by China, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Argentina, Cuba and a few countries in Africa. None of those countries is troubled by illegal immigration. Why? Because no one wants what they have to offer. If our public education system were doing its job, everyone would know this is true.

I believe the majority of Americans registered to vote would reject socialism on a straight-up vote versus capitalism. However, the Democrats are able to parlay the 35%-40% of ignorant voters into a 48%-51% “majority” in a national election through deceptive campaigning aided by a biased media and outright fraud in the elections. The apathy of conservative Christian voters also helps shift the balance in the Democrats’ favor.

What will it be like to live as captives in our own country? Individual rights once guaranteed by the Constitution will be gradually taken away. Free speech, religious freedom, the right to assemble, the right to bear arms and the right to privacy will disappear. Private ownership of property will decrease as massive, forced wealth transfers are initiated by a bloated Washington bureaucracy, universal health care, free college tuition and more of the “free” stuff people wanted.

The “Green New Deal” will drive up energy costs forcing average Americans to pay a high percentage of their income for necessities such as transportation and home heating. Eventually, the “Deal” will outlaw all petroleum powered vehicles putting an end to or making the cost prohibitive for many recreational pursuits. Endless government restrictions on manufacturing and commerce will hobble the economy lowering actual revenue to government causing repeated rounds of increased taxation.

Except for the 1^st, 2^nd and 4^th Amendment freedoms mentioned above, the rest of what Christians will lose is economic in nature. Because there is no biblical right to wealth (ignoring the prosperity gospel position), there is no sound biblical footing to oppose much of the Democrat program. Sincere Christians from both parties could honestly debate immigration policy, economic measures, the proper size and scope of government itself and many other issues.

The problem is that there has been no debate (see “What’s Wrong With Politics in America”). The progressive agenda (aka socialism) is taking the country by force. This is not a war won by armed troops and bombs; this war has been waged in increments by stealth. The root of “stealth” is “steal.” That is apropos: the freedoms conservatism cherishes and protects are being stolen from us while we sleep. I just hope that when we wake up in Babylon it won’t be too late to reverse the damage caused by the theft.

Related posts: “Obama Isn’t the Problem”; “Tsunami Warning”; and just for fun ”A Modest Proposal”